Dampak Tarif Impor Output dan Input Terhadap Probabilitas Perusahaan Keluar dari Pasar
Abstract Views: 1313 |
PDF
Downloads: 1175
Downloads
Abstract
Abstrak
Secara teori, dampak tarif impor input dan output terhadap kinerja perusahaan berbeda. Namun, hal tersebut belum terbukti secara empiris di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dampak tarif impor output dan input terhadap probabilitas perusahaan untuk keluar dari pasar. Kajian ini menggunakan model probit yang merupakan salah satu model dari Cummulative Distribution Function (CDF), dengan menggunakan data Survei Industri Besar dan Sedang (IBS) tahun 2003-2014. Kajian ini menemukan bahwa efek kompetisi yang dihasilkan akibat penurunan tarif impor output akan meningkatkan probabilitas perusahaan untuk keluar dari pasar. Namun penurunan tarif impor input akan menurunkan probabilitas perusahaan untuk keluar dari pasar. Setelah mendisagregasi perusahaan berdasarkan beberapa karakteristik yang dapat diobservasi diperoleh bahwa perusahaan yang memproduksi barang konsumsi, perusahaan dalam industri yang padat karya, perusahaan kecil, dan perusahaan yang terdapat pada industri yang lebih kompetitif memiliki peluang utuk keluar dari pasar lebih tinggi. Kajian ini merekomendasikan penetapan kebijakan tarif impor perlu dikaji baik dari sisi jenis komoditi maupun dari sisi karakteristik perusahaan.
Kata Kunci: Liberalisasi Tarif Impor, Seleksi Pasar, Probabilitas Perusahaan Keluar
Abstract
Theoretically, the impact of output and input import tarif on firm’s performance is different, however this have never been shown empirically in Indonesia. This study aims at examining the effect of input and output tarifs on the possibility of firms to exit. Study utilized probit model which is considered as one of the Cummulative Distribution Function (CDF) Model by Indonesian Manufacturing Firms Data from 2003-2014 it was found that competition effects resulting from lower output tarifs exerts greater impact on the likelihood of exit but decreasing input tarifs will actually reduce the probability of exit firms. After classifying our sample into a different group based on observed characteristics of industry and firm, we found firms that produce consumer good, labor intensive firm, small firms, firms in competitive industry have a higher probability to exit. The study suggested that import tariff policy needs to be assessed both in terms of commodity types and in terms of firm characteristics.
Keywords: Import Tarif Liberalization, Market Selection, Firm Exit
JEL Classification: F13, L25, O24
References
Acemoglu, D., & Zilibotti, F. (2001). Productivity Differences. The Quarterly Journals of Economics, (May), 563–606.
Amiti, M., & Cameron, L. (2012). Trade Liberalization and the Wage Skill Premium: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of International Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2012.01.009
Amiti, M., & Konings, J. (2007). Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs, and Productivity: Evidence from Indonesia, 9, 1611–1637.
Baggs, J. (2005). Firm Survival and Exit in Response to Trade Liberalization, 38(4), 1364–1383.
Bartelsman, E., Haltiwanger, J., & Scarpetta, S. (2004). Microeconomic evidence of creative destruction in industrial and developing countries. World Bank Working Paper Series, (1374). https://doi.org/-
Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, J. B. (2002). The Deaths of Manufacturing Plants. NBER Working Paper, (9026), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.315665
Eslava, M., Haltiwanger, J., Kugler, A., & Kugler, M. (2013). Trade and market selection: Evidence from manufacturing plants in Colombia. Review of Economic Dynamics, 16(1), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2012.10.009
Grossman, G., & Helpman, E. (1990). Trade, Knowledge Spillovers and Growth (No. 3485).
Imbruno, M. (2011). Trade Liberalization , Intermediate Inputs and Firm Competitiveness : Direct versus Indirect Modes of Import. Working Paper. University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Jehle & Reny.(2011). Advanced Microeconomic Theory. University of Chicago. (Third Edition)
Koren, M., & Tenreyro, S. (2007). CEP Discussion Paper No 824 October 2007 Technological Diversification, (824).
Koujianou, P., Amit, G., Khandelwal, K., Pavcnik, N., & Topalova, P. (n.d.). Imported Intermediate Input and Domestic Product Growth: Evidence From India.
Luong, T. A. (2011). The Impact of Input and Output Tariffs on Firms Productivity : Theory and Evidence. Review of International Economics, 11(5), 821–835. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.2011.00988.x
Mao, Q., & Sheng, B. (2017a). The impact of tariff reductions on firm dynamics and productivity in China: Does market-oriented transition matter? China Economic Review, 45(October 2016), 168–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2017.07.011
Mao, Q., & Sheng, B. (2017b). The impact of tariff reductions on firm dynamics and productivity in China: Does market-oriented transition matter? China Economic Review. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2017.07.011
Melitz, M. J., & Polanec, S. (2015). Dynamic Olley-Pakes productivity decomposition with entry and exit. RAND Journal of Economics, 46(2), 362–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12088
Narjoko, D. A. (2009). Plant Entry in a More Liberalised Industrialisation Process: An Experience of Indonesian Manufacturing during the 1990s, 356–406. Retrieved from http://www.eria.org/publications/research_project_reports/images/pdf/y2008/no1/DEI-Ch10.pdf
Pavcnik, N. (2002). Evidence from Chilean Plants, 69(1), 245–276. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2695960
Rodrik, D. (1988). Imperfect Competition , Scale Economies , and Trade Policy in Developing Countries. Policy.
Schor, A. (2004). Heterogeneous productivity response to tariff reduction. Evidence from Brazilian manufacturing firms. Journal of Development Economics, 75(2 SPEC. ISS.), 373–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.06.003
Sharma, S. (2013). Imported Intermediate Inputs and Workforce Composition: Evidence from India’s Tariff Liberalization.
Sönmez, A. (2013). Firm Entry, Survival, and Exit. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(9), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n9p160
Takii, S. (2016). Import Penetration, Export Orientation and Plant Size in Indonesian Manufacturing. In ERIA Research Project Report 2013-3, pp.VI-1-VI-24.
Xie, V. W. (2017). Heterogeneous firms under regional temperature shocks : exit and reallocation , with evidence from Indonesia.
Copyright (c) 2019 Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan
