PEMANFAATAN KERJA SAMA INDONESIA-JEPANG ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (IJEPA) DAN INDONESIA – PAKISTAN PREFERENTIAL TRADE AGREEMENT (IPPTA)

  • Endah Ayu Ningsih Kementerian Perdagangan
  • Telisa Aulia Falianty Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Indonesia
  • Fitri Tri Budiarti Kementerian Perdagangan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30908/bilp.v12i2.313
Abstract Views: 2119 | PDF Downloads: 4588

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  
Keywords: Utilisasi FTA, FTA Utilization, IJEPA, IP-PTA

Abstract

Abstrak

Penelitian ini mengevaluasi tingkat pemanfaatan Indonesia-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (IJEPA) dan Indonesia-Pakistan Preferential Trade Agreement (IPPTA) dalam ekspor dan impor Indonesia ke Jepang dan Pakistan. Tingkat pemanfaatan FTA untuk ekspor menggunakan rasio nilai perdagangan yang termuat dalam Surat Keterangan Asal (SKA) terhadap nilai ekspor ke negara mitra. Sedangkan tingkat pemanfaatan impor menggunakan rasio nilai impor produk yang memenuhi syarat terhadap total impor Indonesia dari negara mitra. Studi ini menemukan bahwa pemanfaatan IJEPA (2012-2016) cenderung menurun. Pada tahun 2016 tingkat pemanfaatan ekspor sebesar 47,2%. Sementara pemanfaatan IPPTA untuk ekspor ke Pakistan mengalami peningkatan yang signifikan sejak diimplementasi tahun 2013 dengan tingkat pemanfaatan ekspor sebesar 72,0% pada tahun 2016. Di sisi impor pemanfaatan IJEPA mencapai 67,7% sementara IPPTA hanya 18,8% (2016). Pemanfaatan impor IJEPA dan IPPTA relatif stagnan, jumlah perusahaan yang menggunakan SKA IJEPA sudah pada level jenuh, sementara pengguna SKA IPPTA masih tumbuh 18,2% per tahun. Bentuk PTA lebih memberikan dampak positif bagi peningkatan ekspor Indonesia ke negara mitra dibandingkan FTA yang komprehensif. Kebijakan melakukan FTA dalam bentuk Economic Partnership perlu disertai dengan kerja sama yang menjamin peningkatan perdagangan yang seimbang antar negara anggota.

 

Abstract

This study aims to address the utilization level of The Indonesia-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (IJEPA) and Indonesia-Pakistan Preferential Trade Agreement (IPPTA). The level of FTA utilization for exports was measured by the ratio of trade value recorded in the Certificate of Origin (CoO) to Indonesia’s export value to the related country. While the level of utilization of imports was defined by the ratio of the import value of eligible products to Indonesia's total imports from the related country. The study found IJEPA’s utilization during 2012-2016 tended to decrease. In 2016, the level of utilization was about 47.2%. While IPPTA utilization for exports to Pakistan experienced a significant increase since it was implemented in 2013 with a rate of export utilization was 72.0% in 2016. On the import side, the level of utilization under IJEPA reached 67.7% while IPPTA was only 18.8% at the same period. In terms of the imports utilization level of both IJEPA and IPPTA, it was relatively stagnant, while the number of companies utilize IJEPA’s CoO was saturated. In contrast, IPPTA’s CoO users still grew at 18.2% per year. This study concluded PTA provides more positive impact on increasing Indonesia's exports to related countries than comprehensive FTAs. Thus, establishing an FTA in the form of an Economic Partnership needs to be followed with the cooperation that guarantees trade balance within the parties.

References

Ando, M. Kimura, F. (2012). How Did the Japanese Exports Respond to Two Crises in the International Production Network?: The Global Financial Crisis and the East Japan Earthquake. ASEAN Economic Journal, Volume 26(3), Halaman 261-287

Ardiyanti, S.T. (2015). Dampak Perjanjian Perdagangan Indonesia-Jepang (IJEPA) Terhadap Kinerja Perdagangan Bilateral. Buletin Ilmiah Litbang perdagangan, Vol: 9(2), halaman 129-15

Athukorala, P.C. & A. Kohpaiboon. (2011). ‘Australia–Thailand Trade: Has the FTA Made a Difference?’, Australia National University Working Papers in Trade and Development No. 2011/12, Canberra: ANU.

Budiarti, F.T & Hastiadi, F.T. (2015). Analisis Dampak Indonesia Japan Economic Partnership Agreement terhadap Price-Cost Margins Industri Manufaktur Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia, Vol: 15(2), Halaman 192-209

Candau, O., Carrare, C., De Melo, J., & Tumurchudur, B. (2004). The Utilization Rate of Preferences in the EU. Paper presented at the 7th Global Economic Analysis Conference, Washington D.C., 17-19 June 2004.

Cheong, I. (2014). Korea’s Polcy Pavlage for Enhancing its FTA Utilization and Implications for Korea’s Policy. Eria Discussion Paper Series ERIA-DP-2014-11.

Gocklas C.S, L. Sulasmiyati, Sri. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Indonesia-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (IJEPA) Terhadap Nilai Perdagangan Indonesia-Jepang. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB), Vol: 5(5), halaman 191- 200

Hayakawa, K., Laksanapanyakul, N., & Shiino, K. (2013a). Some Practical Guidance for the Computation of Free Trade Agreement Utilization Rates. IDE Discussion Paper No. 438.

Hayakawa, K., Laksanapanyakul, N., & Shiino, K. (2013b). FTA Utilization: Certificate of Origin Data Versus Customs Data. Institute of Developing Economies (IDE) Discussion Paper No 428

Hayakawa, K. (2014). Impact of diagonal cumulation rule on FTA utilization: Evidence from bilateral and multilateral FTAs between Japan and Thailand. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Volume 32, halaman 1-16.

Hayakawa, K., Kim, Hansung., Lee, Hyun-Hoon. (2014). Determinants on Utilization of Korea-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: Margin Effect, Scale Effect, and ROO effect. World Trade Review, Volume 13(3), halaman 499-515.

Hayakawa, K., Laksanapanyakul, N., Urata, S. (2016). Measuring the Cost of FTA Utilization: Evidence from Transaction-Level Import Data of Thailand. Review of World Economics, Volume 152(3), Halaman 559-575.

Hayakawa, K. Laksanapanyakul, N. (2017). Impacts of Common Rules of Origin on FTA Utilization. International Economics and Economic Policy, Volume 14(1), halaman 75-90.

Inama, S. (2003). Trade Preferences and the World Trade Organization Negotiations on Market Access. Journal of World Trade, 37 (5), 959-979

Ing, Lili Yan., Urata, S., Fukunaga, Y. (2016). How Do Exports and Imports Affect the Use of Free Trade Agreements? Firm-level Survey Evidence from Southeast Asia, ERIA Discussion Paper Series, ERIA-DP-2016-01.

Itaravitak, C., Mudkum, C., Panpheng, K. (2011). Rules of Origin and Utilization of Free Trade Agreements: An Econometric Analysis. TDRI Quarterly Review

Kawai, M. & G. Wignaraja. (2011). Asia’s Free Trade Agreements: How is Business Responding? Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar.

Kawai, M., Wignaraja, G. (2013). Patterns of Free Trade Areas in Asia. East West Center, Honolulu (Hawai)

Keck, Alexander & Lendle, Andreas. (2012). "New evidence on preference utilization," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2012-12, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. (2018). Joint Press Statement on the Occasion of the entry into force of the Agreement between Japan and the Republic of Indonesia for an Economic Partnership. Dipetik Juni 2018 dari MOFA: https://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/indonesia/joint0807.html

PBC. (2015). An Analysis Of The Pakistan-Indonesia Pta & A Framework For Negotiating The Pakistan-Indonesia FTA.

Okabe, Misa. (2015). ‘Impact of Free Trade Agreements on Trade in East Asia’, ERIA Discussion paper Series, ERIA-DP-2015-01

Ratananarumitsorn, T., T. Piyanirun, & Laksanapanyakul. (2008). “ Utilization of Free Trade Agreement Preferences: The Case of Thai Agricultural Export”, TDRI Quarterly Review (September), pp. 11-18

Setiawan, S. (2012). Analisis Dampak IJEPA Terhadap Indonesia dan Jepang. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Vol: 17(2).

Sitepu, E.M.P., Nurhidayat, R. (2015). Mengukur Tingkat Pemanfaatan FTA yang telah dilakukan Indonesia: Studi Kasus dengan Menggunakan FTA Preferences Indicator. Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan, Volume 19, No.3 halaman 284-298.

Takahashi, K., & Urata, S. (2008). On the use of FTAs by Japanese firms (Discussion Paper No. 08-E-002). Tokyo: Research Institute of Economy, Trade, and Industry.

Takahashi, K., & Urata, S. (2009). On the use of FTAs by Japanese firms: Further Evidence. Discussion Paper Series No. 09-E-028. Tokyo: Research Institute of Economy, Trade, and Industry.

Wignaraja, G. Lazaro, D. De Guzman, Genevieve. (2009). Factrors Affecting Use or Nonuse of Free Trade Agreements in the Philipines. Philipines Journal of Development, Vol: 36(2), halaman 69-95

Published
2018-12-31
How to Cite
Ningsih, E. A., Falianty, T. A., & Budiarti, F. T. (2018). PEMANFAATAN KERJA SAMA INDONESIA-JEPANG ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (IJEPA) DAN INDONESIA – PAKISTAN PREFERENTIAL TRADE AGREEMENT (IPPTA). Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan, 12(2), 181-204. https://doi.org/10.30908/bilp.v12i2.313
Section
Articles