FASILITAS BEBAS BEA MASUK BAGI LEAST DEVELOPED COUNTRIES DAN MANFAATNYA BAGI INDONESIA
Abstract Views: 578 |
PDF
Downloads: 1545
Downloads
Abstract
Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji manfaat pemberian fasilitas bebas bea masuk bagi negara penerima yang dikelompokkan ke dalam LDC dan manfaatnya bagi Indonesia sebagai negara pemberi. Metode yang digunakan adalah Indeks Spesialisasi Perdagangan, Indeks Intra Industry Trade, Uji Beda dan Model Keseimbangan Umum GTAP. Hasil analisis yang diperoleh menunjukkan bahwa fasilitas bantuan akses pasar tersebut tidak merugikan industri nasional dan merupakan sumber alternatif untuk memperoleh bahan baku. Hal tersebut akan semakin kuat jika Indonesia memanfaatkan fleksibilitas sebagai negara berkembang yang tidak diwajibkan untuk menghapus bea masuk seluruh pos tarif yang dikenakan kepada negara-negara LDC. Namun, dalam pelaksanaannya fasilitasi tersebut harus diikuti dengan pemberlakuan surat keterangan asal yang ketat untuk meminimalkan kemungkinan penyelundupan dari negara bukan anggota LDC.
This study is conducted to investigate the benefits of the duty-free facility for the Least Developed Countries (LDC) as receivers and the benefits for Indonesia as a donor. The methods of analysis used in this study are Trade Specialization Index, Index of Intra Industry Trade, Differential Test and General Equilibrium Model of GTAP. The study found that the duty-free facility is not detrimental to the national industry and as an alternative source of obtaining raw materials. It will be stronger if Indonesia utilizing the flexibility as developing country with no obligation to remove all import duties charged to LDC countries. However, in practice, such kind of facilitation should be followed by the application of strict certificate of origin to minimize the possibility of smuggling from countries other than the members of the LDC.
References
Adiningsih, S., et al. (2009). Sustainable Development Impacts of Investment Incentives: A Case Study of the Chemical Industry in Indonesia. International Institute for Sustainable Development.
Berisha-Krasniqi, V., et al. (2008). The Development Promise: Can the Doha Development Agenda Deliver for Least- Developed Countries? IFPRI Note 14: Washington, DC. IFRI.
Bouet, A., et al. (2010). The Costs and Benefits of Duty-Free, Quota-Free Market Access for Poor Countries. Who and What Matters? IFPRI Discussion Paper 00990: Washington, DC. Markets, Trade and Institutions Division, IFPRI.
Bouet, A. (2008). The Expected Benefits from Trade Liberalization-Opening The Black Box of Global Trade Modelling. IFPRI Food Policy Review 8: Washington, DC.IFRI.
Drajat, U.A. (2008). Unveiling Protectionism: Regional Responses to Remaining Barriers in the Textiles and Clothing Trade. UNESCAP.
Douillet, M. (2012). Trade and Agricultural Policies in Malawi: Not All Policy Reform is Equally Good for the Poor. MPRA Paper No. 40948. Munich Personal RePEc Archive.
Elliot, K. (2012). Breaking the Deadlock on Market Access for Leat Develop Countries dalam The Future and the WTO: Confronting the Challenges diedit oleh Ricardo Melendez-Ortiz, Christophe Belimann, dan Miquel Rodriquez Mendoza: Geneva. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development.
FAO. (2004). The State of Agricultural Commodity Markets. Roma
Puska KPI. (2012). Kegiatan Focus Group Discussion Pelaksanaan Pemberian Bebas Bea Masuk dan Bebas Kuota Bagi Negara LDC, Dilaksanakan diHotel Akmani, Jakarta, 8 November 2012.
Firmansyah. (1998). Prospek Komoditas Sayuran dan Buah-Buahan. Jakarta : Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia.
Francois, J.F., B. J. Mcdonald dan H. Nordström. (1996). Liberalization and Capital Accumulation in the GTAP Mode. GTAP Technical Paper No. 7.
Goldar, B. (2005). Impact on India of Tariff and Quantitative Restriction under WTO. Indian Working Paper No.172. Council for Research on International Economic Relations.
Grubel, H.G., and P.J. Lloyd. (1971). The Empirical Measurement of Intra Industry Trade. Economic Record 47 (4). Diunduh melalui http:// onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ j.1475-4932.1971.tb00772./abstract ; jsessionid=2519A12909190B3C398 BA85821D61FB6.d01t3, pada 20 Juni 2012.
Hallaert, J.J. (2008). How does a domestic tax reform affect protection against imports?. IMF Working Paper. WP/08/151.
Haryadi. (2010). Dampak Penghapusan Tarif Oleh Negara-Negara Anggota WTO terhadap Permintaan Tenaga Kerja di Indonesia. Ilmu Ekonomi dan Studi Pembangunan, Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Jambi
Hermawan, I. (2011). Analisis Dampak Kebijakan Makroekonomi Terhadap Perkembangan Industri Tekstil dan Produk Tekstil Indonesia. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan, Bank Indonesia.
Hoekman, B., F. Ng, M. Olarreaga. (2002). Reducing Agricultural Tariffs versus Domestic Support: What’s More Important for Developing Countries?. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2918.
Indotextiles. (2012). Import of Raw Materials Continue to Rise. [online]. http://www.indotextiles.com/index. php?option=com_content&task=view&i d=2285&Itemid=72. (diakses 14 Agustus 2012).
Kementerian Perdagangan. (2008). Indeks Spesialisasi Perdagangan. Diunduh melalui http://www.kemendag.go.id, pada 20 Juni 2012.
Li, X.L. and C.A., Carter. (2009). The Impact of Tariff-Rate Import Quotas on Market Access. Davis : Department University of California.
Nicita, A. (2005). Multilateral Trade Liberalization and Mexican Households:The Effect of the Doha Development Agenda dalam Putting Development Back into the Doha Agenda: Poverty Impacts of a WTO Agreement, Thomas W. Hertel and L. Alan Winters (ed). Washington, DC: World Bank.
NZIER Viewpoint. (2010). The economic impacts of retaining tariffs in New Zealand: A dynamic CGE analysis. Working Paper 2010/1.
Park, D., et al. (2008). Prospects of an ASEAN–People’s Republic of China Free Trade Area: A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis. Economics Working Paper Series No. 30, Asian Development Bank.
Pusat Data dan Informasi (Pusdatin). (2012). Neraca Perdagangan Indonesia: Jakarta. Kementerian Perdagangan.
Rachbini, D. J. (2008). Hancurnya Sistem Pertanian Kedelai. Diunduh melalui http:// www.nabble.com/-sastra-pembebasan- --Hancurnya-Sistem -Produksi Kedelai- td14988452.html, pada 14 Agustus 2012.
Robertson, R., S. et al. (2003). Globalization and Working Conditions: Evidence from Indonesia. Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis: Yogyakarta. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Siregar, M. dan S. Suryadi. (2006). Enhancing Sustainable Development of Diverse Agriculture In Indonesia. CAPSA Working Paper No. 97 (UNESCAP).
Siriwardana, M. (2000). Effects of Trade Liberalization in South Asia With Special Reference to Srilanka (paper). Dipresentasikan pada Third Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 23-30 Juni
Salvatore, D. (1997). Ekonomi Internasional. Edisi Kelima. Penerjemah Haris Munandar: Jakarta. Penerbit Erlangga.
United Nation Conference on Trade and Developement (UNCTAD). (2012). Research and Policy Analysis on LDCs. Geneve. Diunduh tanggal 20 Juni 2013 dari http://unctad.org/en/Pages/ALDC/ Least %20Developed %20Countries/ Research-and-Policy-Analysis-on- LDCs.aspx
Copyright (c) 2017 Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan
