ECO-LABELING AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE AGREEMENTS: THE CASE OF MARINE STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL CERTIFICATION FOR INDONESIA'S SHRIMP POTENTIAL MARKET
Abstract Views: 844 |
PDF
Downloads: 477
Downloads
Abstract
Abstrak
Artikel ini membahas analisis biaya dan manfaat dari Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) untuk ekspor udang putih (Litopenaeus vannamei) dan udang windu (Penaeus monodon) dari Indonesia. Penerapan MSC pada produk perikanan memang tidak wajib, tetapi dapat mempengaruhi kinerja eskpor Indonesia. Perhitungan analisa biaya dan manfaat untuk proyek MSC menggunakan beberapa pilihan yang dihitung ke dalam empat komponen analysis yang terpisah (Proyek, Privat, Efisiensi, dan kelompok penerima manfaat). Dengan menggunakan data tahun 2018 dan jangka waktu investasi selama 20 tahun, kajian ini membandingkan hasil investasi yang menerapkan standard MSC dengan hasil investasi yang tidak menerapkan standard MSC dengan mempertimbangkan hambatan dari biaya perdagangan internasional. Secara keselurahan, studi ini menunjukkan bahwa the Net Present Values (NPVs) and Internal Rate of Returns (IRRs) bersifat konsisten untuk semua pilihan analysis. Studi ini juga menyimpulkan bahwa berdasarkan hasil dari analisis pasar, Amerika Serikat adalah pasar yang menjanjikan bagi produk udang Indonesia yang berlabelkan MSC. Pemerintah Indonesia akan menikmati 13% kenaikan pendapatan dari pajak keuntungan bisnis tersebut, meskipun proyek ini tidak memberikan dampak perubahan kepada tenaga kerja tidak terampil. Oleh karena itu, studi ini merekomendasikan pemerintah Indonesia untuk mempromosikan program MSC untuk perikanan berkelanjutan, terutama bagi peningkatan kinerja eskpor udang Indonesia.
Kata Kunci: Kebijakan Perdagangan, Perikanan Tangkap, Keberlanjutan, Cost-Benefit Analysis
Abstract
This paper discusses the cost and benefits analysis of the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) for Indonesia's exports of white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) and tiger prawns (Penaeus monodon). The MSC adoption is voluntary, but it is likely to affect the performance of Indonesia's exports. We use several options applied separately in four components analysis in performing the social cost and benefit analysis (Project, Private, Efficiency, and Referral Group). Using the 2018 data and a 20-year investment period, this study compares the investment results applying the MSC standard with the results without investing in the MSC procedures concerning the trade cost barriers. Overall, the results reveal that the Net Present Values (NPVs) and Internal Rate of Returns (IRRs) are consistent for all options in all feasibility component analyses. It concludes that based on market analysis, the US market is the promising market as a primary export destination for Indonesian shrimp products with MSC label. The government will benefit by 13% from profit taxes, while this project does not affect unskilled labor benefits. Therefore, it recommends that the Indonesian government take more action to promote the MSC program for sustainable fisheries and boost shrimp export performance.
Keywords: Trade Policy, Capture Fisheries, Sustainability, Cost-Benefit Analysis
JEL Classification: F13, Q22, Q56, H43
References
REFERENCES
Adler, M. D., & Posner, E. A. (1999). Rethinking Cost-Benefit Analysis. The Yale Law Journal, 109(2), 165-247.
Aquaculture Stewardship Council. (2017). Tokyo seminar gathers stakeholders interest.
Bellchambers, L. M., Phillips, B. F., & Pérez-Ramírez, M. (2016). From certification to recertification the benefits and challenges of the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC): A case study using lobsters. Fisheries Research, 182, 88-97. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2015.08.029
Blandon, A., & Ishihara, H. (2021). Seafood certification schemes in Japan: Examples of challenges and opportunities from three Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) applicants. Marine Policy, 123. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104279
BPS-Statistic Indonesia. (2020). Produksi Perikanan Tangkap Menurut Provinsi dan Jenis Penangkapan 2017. from BPS-Statistic Indonesia
Campbell, H. F., & Richard P.C. Brown. (2016). Cost-benefit analysis: financial and economic appraisal using spreadsheets. London [England], New York [USA] Routledge.
Chenyi He , K. K. Q. H. H. W. (2013). Determinants of shrimp importation into the USA: an application of an augmented gravity model. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies(3), 219-228. doi:10.1080/14765284.2013.814466
Christian, C., Ainley, D., Bailey, M., Dayton, P., Hocevar, J., LeVine, M., . . . Jacquet, J. (2013). A review of formal objections to Marine Stewardship Council fisheries certifications. Biological Conservation, 161, 10-17. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2013.01.002
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). ( 2019). Country assessment gender of agriculture and the rural sector in Indonesia. Retrieved from Jakarta:
Gillett, R. (2008). Global study of shrimp fisheries (Vol. 475): Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome.
Glynn, S. (2010). Eco-labelling: The new cost of doing business in the seafood sector. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, Retrieved from http://anu.summon.serialssolutions.com (Dissertation/Thesis)
GRO. (2020). Ratusan Nelayan Tuna Pulau Buru Raih Sertifikat Ecolabelling MSC. Harian Ekonomi Neraca.
Hatanaka, M. (2010a). Certification, Partnership, and Morality in an Organic Shrimp Network: Rethinking Transnational Alternative Agrifood Networks. World development, 38(5), 706-716. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.11.001
Hatanaka, M. (2010b). Governing sustainability: examining audits and compliance in a third-party-certified organic shrimp farming project in rural Indonesia. Local Environment, 15(3), 233-244. doi:10.1080/13549830903575588
Howes, R. (2008). The Marine Stewardship Council Programme. In T. Ward & B. Phillips (Eds.), SEAFOOD Ecolabelling (pp. 81-105). Oxford, UK: Wiley‐Blackwell.
International Trade Centre (ITC). (2020). Yearly Trade by Commodity Statistics 2001 - 2019.
Kasim, K. (2019). Fishery Performance Indicators (FPIs) and Production Analysis: What Works Before and After the Ban of Cantrang Trawl Fishing in the Java Sea–Indonesia. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, (Dissertation/Thesis)
Lajus, D., Stogova, D., & Keskitalo, E. C. H. (2018). The implementation of Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) certification in Russia: Achievements and considerations. Marine Policy, 90, 105-114. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2018.01.001
Lallemand, P., Bergh, M., Hansen, M., & Purves, M. (2016). Estimating the economic benefits of MSC certification for the South African hake trawl fishery. Fisheries Research, 182, 98-115. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2016.02.003
Le Manach, F., Jacquet, J. L., Bailey, M., Jouanneau, C., & Nouvian, C. (2020). Small is beautiful, but large is certified: A comparison between fisheries the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) features in its promotional materials and MSC-certified fisheries. Plos One, 15(5). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231073
Marine Stewardship Council. (2021). Fishery certification guide Fisheries. Retrieved from https://www.msc.org/for-business/fisheries/fishery-certification-guide
Melser, D., & Robertson, P. E. (2005). Eco-labelling and the Trade-Environment Debate. World economy, 28(1), 49-62. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2005.00674.x
Peraturan Menteri Kelautan dan Perikanan. (2015). Bans the use of trawls and seine nets for catching fish.
Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries. (2019). Laporan Tahunan 2018. Retrieved from Jakarta:
Ponte, S. (2012). The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) and the Making of a Market for ‘Sustainable Fish’. Journal of Agrarian Change, 12(2‐3), 300-315. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0366.2011.00345.x
Resosudarmo, B. P., & Kosadi, E. (2018). Illegal Fishing War: An Environmental Policy during the Jokowi Era? Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 35(3), 369-385. doi:10.1355/ae35-3d
Seekao, C., & Pharino, C. (2018). Cost‐benefit analysis of shrimp farming's flood risk reduction strategies in Thailand. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 11, S805-S816. doi:10.1111/jfr3.12259
Toonen, H. M., & Mol, A. P. J. (2013). Putting sustainable fisheries on the map? Establishing no-take zones for North Sea plaice fisheries through MSC certification. Marine Policy, 37((C)), 294-304.
Tsutsui, I., Songphatkaew, J., Meeanan, C., Aue-umneoy, D., Sukchai, H., Pinphoo, P., . . . Hamano, K. (2015). Co-culture with Chaetomorpha sp. enhanced growth performance and reduced feed conversion ratio of the giant tiger prawn, Penaeus monodon. International Aquatic Research, 7(3), 193-199. doi:10.1007/s40071-015-0103-0
UNCTAD. (2018). Handbook of Statistics.
Vestergaard, N., Stoyanova, K. A., & Wagner, C. (2010). Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Greenland Offshore Shrimp Fishery. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, 8, 98.
Wati, L. A., Wen-I, C., & Mustadjab, M. M. (2013). Competitiveness of Indonesian Shrimp Compare with Thailand Shrimp in Export Market. Wacana 16(1), 24-31.
Wessells, C. R., Johnston, R. J., & Donath., H. (1999. ). Assessing consumer preferences for eco-labelled seafood: the influence of species, certifier and household attributes. American journal of agricultural economics, 81, 1084-1089.
Wijen, F., & Chiroleu-Assouline, M. (2019). Controversy Over Voluntary Environmental Standards: A Socioeconomic Analysis of the Marine Stewardship Council. Organization & Environment, 32(2), 98-124. doi:10.1177/1086026619831449
World Wildlife Fund. (2015). PENANGKAPAN UDANG RAMAH LINGKUNGAN: Dengan Alat Tangkap Jaring Tiga Lapis (Trammel Net). Retrieved from Jakarta, Indonesia:
Yi, D., & Reardon, T. (2015). Allocative Efficiency of Agrifood Traders: Shrimp Traders in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies: Transformation of the Indonesian Agrifood System and the Future beyond Rice, 51(3), 405-423. doi:10.1080/00074918.2015.1107676
Copyright (c) 2021 Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan
