ANALISIS KEPENTINGAN SPECIAL SAFEGUARD MECHANISM INDONESIA DALAM NEGOSIASI PERTANIAN DI WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION (WTO)

Authors

  • Adrian Darmawan Lubis Kementerian Perdagangan
  • Firman Mutakin Kementerian Perdagangan
  • Reni K. Arianti Kementerian Perdagangan
Abstract Views: 868 | PDF Downloads: 476

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  

Abstract

Multilateral liberalization negotiations at the World Trade Organization is currently discussing the issue of protecting domestic producers from import surge through the scheme of Special Safeguard Mechanism (SSM). SSM negotiations currently discussing the method of determining the value of SSM trigger. The results of this study found that the three-month Moving Average Method-by not using pro-rating-is the best method of determining SSM trigger value for Indonesia. However, data limitations led Indonesia to only be able to monitor changes in price for 5.67% of total agricultural products are traded. Therefore, it is necessary to establish institutions that are authorized to analyze the impact of changes in prices and imports, where the results will be used as a determinant when the SSM is implemented.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Adrian Darmawan Lubis, Kementerian Perdagangan

Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perdagangan Luar Negeri

Firman Mutakin, Kementerian Perdagangan

Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perdagangan Luar Negeri

Reni K. Arianti, Kementerian Perdagangan

Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perdagangan Luar Negeri

References

A. M. Bloem, R. J. Dippelsman, and N. O. Maehle (2001), “Quarterly National Accounts Manual - Concepts, Data Sources, and Compilation, Washington DC: International Monetary fund â€, available at: http://www. imf.org/ external/pubs/ft/qna/2000/ Textbook/index.htm

Australia Proposal, 2009. “Application for SSMâ€, Disampaikan dalam Rapat Agreement on Agriculture Tahun 2009. WTO, Geneva

canada Proposal, 2009. “ Special Products Data Sourcesâ€, Disampaikan dalam Rapat Agreement on Agriculture Tahun 2007. WTO, Geneva.

Erwidodo, 2009. “Perkembangan Perundingan DDA-WTO: Bidang Pertanianâ€. Disampaikan dalam Rapat Pertemuan Satuan Tugas G-33 di Departemen Pertanian, Jakarta.

Eurostat (1999), “Handbook on Quarterly National Accounts, Luxembourg: european Communitiesâ€, available at: http://epp.eurostat.cec.eu.int/ por tal /page?_pageid= 1073, 1135281,1073_1 135295 &_dad= portal&_schema=PORTAL &p_ product_code=cA-22-99-781

Gorter, K., and Nassar, 2006. “The Implications of The Special Safeguard Mechanism for Developing Countriesâ€, WTO, Geneva.

Sharma, R. (2006). “Triggers And Remedy for Special Safeguard Mechanism â€, WTO, Geneva.

Tim Puslitbang Daglu. 2008. “Analisa Bawang Merah Brebesâ€. Current Issue Balitbang Perdagangan, Jakarta.

Downloads

Published

2010-07-31

How to Cite

Lubis, A. D., Mutakin, F., & Arianti, R. K. (2010). ANALISIS KEPENTINGAN SPECIAL SAFEGUARD MECHANISM INDONESIA DALAM NEGOSIASI PERTANIAN DI WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION (WTO). Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan, 4(1), 63–74. Retrieved from https://jurnal.kemendag.go.id/index.php/bilp/article/view/146

Issue

Section

Articles