DAMPAK KEBERADAAN PERWAKILAN PERDAGANGAN LUAR NEGERI TERHADAP KINERJA EKSPOR NON MIGAS INDONESIA

Ayu Sinta Saputri; Septika Tri Ardiyanti

doi:10.30908/bilp.v10i2.53

Ayu Sinta Saputri Kementerian Perdagangan
Septika Tri Ardiyanti Kementerian Perdagangan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30908/bilp.v10i2.53

Abstract Views: 835 |

PDF Downloads: 908

Ethical Statement Downloads: 0

Formulir Copyright Transfer Downloads: 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Keywords: Ekspor, Perwakilan Perdagangan, Fungsi Permintaan, Export, Trade Representative, Demand Function

Abstract

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dampak pembentukan Atase Perdagangan (Atdag) dan Indonesian Trade Promotion Center (ITPC) terhadap kinerja ekspor non migas Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan adalah random effect model fungsi permintaan dengan menggunakan nilai ekspor non migas Indonesia dan pangsa ekspor non migas Indonesia di negara mitra dagang sebagai indikator-indikator yang menggambarkan kinerja ekspor Indonesia. Kajian ini menunjukkan bahwa keberadaan Atdag dan ITPC memberikan pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap peningkatan ekspor Indonesia. Nilai ekspor dan pangsa ekspor non migas Indonesia di negara mitra dagang dimana terdapat Atdag dan ITPC lebih tinggi jika dibandingkan dengan negara mitra yang belum terdapat Atdag dan ITPC. Di samping itu, besaran anggaran yang diterima oleh para perwakilan perdagangan juga memiliki pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja ekspor Indonesia. Dengan demikian, penguatan dan pengembangan Atdag dan ITPC penting untuk dilakukan dalam rangka peningkatan ekspor Indonesia baik melalui peningkatan besaran anggaran dan atau penambahan jumlah perwakilan perdagangan Indonesia di luar negeri.

This study analyzes the impact of establishing The Indonesia’s Trade Attaché (Atdag) and The Indonesia's Trade Promotion Center (ITPC) on Indonesia’s non-oil exports performance. The method used in this study is random effect model of demand functions using non-oil and gas export value, and non-oil and gas export share of Indonesia in trading partner countries as the indicators of Indonesia’s export performance. The results indicate that the presence of Atdag and ITPC gave a positive and significant effect to improve exports. The value of Indonesia’s non-oil and gas exports, and the share of Indonesia’s non-oil exports with some partner countries of Atdag and ITPC are higher compared to countries without Atdag and ITPC. Moreover, the amount of budget received by the trade representative also has a positive and significant effect on the export performance.Therefore, the government should strengthen and develop Atdag and ITPC in order to boost export by increasing the budget and the number of trade representatives abroad.

Author Biographies

Ayu Sinta Saputri, Kementerian Perdagangan

Pusat Pegkajian Perdagangan Luar Negeri, Badan Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Perdagangan

Septika Tri Ardiyanti, Kementerian Perdagangan

Pusat Pegkajian Perdagangan Luar Negeri, Badan Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Perdagangan

References

Álvarez Espinoza, R., & Crespi, G. (2000). Exporter Performance and Promotion Instruments: Chilean Empirical Evidence. Estudios de Economía, 27(2), 225-224.

Ayob, A. H., & Freixanet, J. (2014). Insights into public export promotion programs in an emerging economy: The case of Malaysian SMEs. Evaluation and program planning Volume 46, 38-46.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2016a). Data Neraca Perdagangan Indonesia Periode 2011 – 2015.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2016b). Data Kinerja Ekspor Indonesia Periode 1996 – 2015 Berdasarkan sektor, kode HS dan Negara Tujuan.

Cadot, O., Fernandes, A.M., Gourdon, J. & Matoo, A. (2015). Are the benefits of export support durable? Evidence from Tunisia. Journal of International Economics, 97(2), 310- 324.

Cassey, A., (2014), The Location of U.S. States’ Overseas Offices, Review of International Economics, 22(2): 310-325.

Durmuşoğlu, S. S., Apfelthaler, G., Nayir, D. Z., Alvarez, R., & Mughan, T. (2012). The effect of government-designed export promotion service use on small and medium-sized enterprise goal achievement: A multidimensional view of export performance. Industrial marketing management 41(4), 680-691.

Ferreira, M. I. V., & Teixeira, A. A. (2011). Organizational Characteristics and Performance of Export Promotion Agencies: Portugal and Ireland compared. Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto. Retrieved from http://ideas.repec.org/p/por/fepwps/424.html.

Freixanet, J. (2012). Export promotion programs: Their impact on companies’ internationalization performance and competitiveness.International Business Review, 21(6), 1065-1086.

Grater, S., Steenkamp, E., Viviers, W., & Cuyvers, L. (2015). Combining the export promotion of products and services: the case of South Africa. Southern African Business Review, 18(3), 93-118.

Hayakawa, K., H.H. Lee, D. Park. (2011). Do Export Promotion Agencies Promote Exports? IDE Discussion Paper No. 313.

Kang, K. (2011). Overseas Network of Export Promotion Agency and Export Performance: The Korean Case. Contemporary Economic Policy, 29(2), 274–283.

Kementerian Perdagangan (Kemendag). (2015). Data Existing Atdag dan ITPC. Makalah: Disajikan Pada Diskusi Terbatas Kajian Pengembangan Pembukaan Perwakilan Perdagangan Luar Negeri Pada Tanggal 10 Februari 2015.

Kostecki, M., & Naray, O. (2007). Commercial Diplomacy and International Business. Netherlands Institute of International Relations’ Clingendael’.

Lederman, D., Olarreaga, M., & Payton, L. (2010). Export Promotion Agencies: Do They Work?. Journal of Development Economics, 91(2), 257-265.

Lederman, D., Olarreaga, M., & Zavala, L. (2015). Export promotion and firm entry into and survival in export markets. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (7400).

Lembaga Arsip Nasional (LAN). (2015). Data Penelusuran Arsip Koleksi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Dirinci Menurut Jenis Keputusan Presiden.

Martincus, C. V., Carballo, J., & Garcia, P. (2010). Firm Size and The Impact of Export Promotion Programs. Applied Economic Letters, 18, 191-244.

Martincus, C. V., & Carballo, J. (2008). Is Export Promotion Effective in Developing Countries? Firm-Level Evidence on The Intensive and The Extensive Margins of Exports. Journal of International Economics, 76(1), 89–106.

Moons, S. (2012). What are the effects of economic diplomacy on the margins of trade?. International Journal of Diplomacy and Economy, 1(2), 147-162.

Nachrowi, D Nachrowi MSc.,MPhil.,AppSc.,PhD. (2005). Pendekatan Populer dan Praktis Ekonometrika untuk Analisis Ekonomi dan Keuangan . Fakultas Ekonomi UI: Jakarta. Hal 309.

Pareja, S.G., R.L. Vivero, J.A.M. Serrano. (2008). Measuring The Impact Of Regional Export Promotion: The Spanish Case. Papers in Regional Science, 87(1), 139-146.

Pareja, S.G., Llorca-Vivero, R., Martínez-Serrano, J. A., & Requena-Silvente, F. (2015). Regional export promotion offices and trade margins. Review of World Economics, 151(1), 145-167.

Rose, A. K. (2007). The Foreign Service and Foreign Trade: Embassies as Export Promotion. The World Economy, 30(1), 22–38.

Ruël, H. J. M., & Zuidema, L. (2012). The Effectiveness of Commercial Diplomacy; ASurvey Among Dutch Embassies and Consulates. Clingendael Discussion Papers Series., (123), 1–54.

Van Biesebroeck, J., Yu, E., Chen, S. (2010). The Impact of Trade Promotion Services on Canadian Exporter Performance. Center for Economic Studies - Discussion papers (DPS) 10.14. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centrum voor Economische Studiën.

Xu, T. S., & Zhang, Y. Q. (2014). Impact of Trade Promotion Agencies on China's Export Binary Marginal Growth. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2, 1-10.