PENGARUH VARIABEL EKONOMI DAN NON EKONOMI TERHADAP IMPOR INDONESIA DARI ASEAN+6 MELALUI MODA TRANSPORTASI LAUT

  • Astari Ayuwangi IPB
  • . Widyastutik IPB
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30908/bilp.v7i2.115
Abstract Views: 3385 | PDF Downloads: 3960

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  
Keywords: Impor, Moda Transportasi, GDP, Kualitas Pelabuhan, Stabilitas Politik, Import, Transportation Mode, Quality of Sea Port, Political Stability

Abstract

Selama periode tahun 2007-2011 impor Indonesia dari negara-negara ASEAN+6 didominasi oleh impor bahan baku dan bahan penolong. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi dominannya impor Indonesia yang dimaksud, khususnya impor Indonesia yang diangkut melalui moda transportasi laut, merupakan tema utama tulisan ini. Variabel-variabel yang digunakan dalam analisis dengan menggunakan model gravity meliputi variabel ekonomi, yakni GDP per kapita ASEAN+6, GDP per kapita Indonesia, jarak ekonomi, nilai tukar riil, dan variabel non-ekonomi, yakni kualitas pelabuhan, stabilitas politik dan efektivitas pemerintahan Indonesia. Hasil estimasi dengan menggunakan pendekatan gravity model menunjukkan bahwa variabel yang secara signifikan berpengaruh positif pada impor Indonesia adalah GDP per kapita Indonesia dan kualitas pelabuhan Indonesia. Sedangkan variabel jarak ekonomi, nilai tukar riil, stabilitas politik dan efektivitas pemerintahan Indonesia secara signifikan berpengaruhnegatif.

 

During 2007-2011, the Indonesia’s imports from the ASEAN+6 countries were dominated by the raw materials. The factors that influence volumes of the Indonesia’s imports, expecially which transported by sea transport mode, become the main topic of this research. The variables of the gravity model used in this research are economic variables, i.e. per capita GDP of ASEAN+6, Indonesia’s per capita GDP, economic distance, and real exchange rate, as well as non-economic variables such as Indonesia’s quality of sea port, political stability and government effectiveness. Estimation using the gravity model shows that the variables of Indonesia’s per capita GDP and Indonesia’s quality of sea ports significantly have positive influence on Indonesia’s imports, while the variables of economic distance, real exchange rate, political stability and government effectiveness significantly have negative influence. 

Author Biographies

Astari Ayuwangi, IPB
Departemen Ilmu Ekonomi, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Manajemen IPB
. Widyastutik, IPB
Departemen Ilmu Ekonomi, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Manajemen IPB

References

Alejandro, L, et al. (2010). Are Estimation Techniques Neutral to Estimate Gravity Equation? An Application to The Impact of EMU on Third Countries Exports. Washington D.C.: U.S. International Trade Commission.

Anderson J.E, E.V Wincoop. (2004). Trade Cost. Journal of Economic Literature. American Economic Association. 42: 691-751.

Areethamsirikul, S. (2006).The Impact of ASEAN Enlargement Intra-ASEAN Trade: Gravity Mode Approach. The Indonesian Quarterly. 34(2): 176-192.

Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2012a). Statistik Indonesia. Jakarta (ID): BPS.

Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2012b). Buletin Statistik Perdagangan Luar Negeri Impor, Berbagai Edisi. Jakarta (ID): BPS.

Brunetti A, G. Kinsuko, B. Weder. (1997). Institutional Obstacle to Doing Business: Region by Region Result from a Worldwide Survey of the Private Sector. Working Paper No. 1759.

O’Chalagan, B. A., and U. Uprasen, (2012). A Qualitative Analysis of the Impact of the Fifth Enlargement on ASEAN. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, Volume 29, No.1 pp 46-64

Centre d’Etudes Prospectives et d’Informations Internationales (CEPII). (2012). Diunduh tanggal 2 Mei 2013 dari [http://cepii.fr/]

Fitzsimons, E., V. Hogan, and P. Neary. (1999). Explaining the Volume of North- South Trade in Ireland: A Gravity Model Approach. Economic and Social Review. 30(4): 381-401.

Grindle, M.S. (2007). Good Enough Governance Revisited. Development Policy Review. 25(5): 553-574.

Hummels, D. (2007). Transportation Cost and International Trade in The Second Era of Globalization. Journal of Economics Perspective. 21: 131-154.

Li, K., L. Song, and X. Zhau. (2008). Component Trade and China’s Global Economics Integration. United Kingdom: United Nations University.

Mankiw, N.G. (2000). Teori Makroekonomi. Edisi ke-5. Jakarta (ID): Erlangga. Terjemahan dari Principles of Macroeconomics oleh Imam N.

Mikiz, M. 2009. Liberalizing Trade in Services in ASEAN. UN ESCAP.

Panggabean, G. (2013). Ekonomi Biaya Tinggi pada Sektor Logistik di Pelabuhan Belawan Medan. Jakarta: KPPU.

Salvatore, D. (1997). Ekonomi Internasional. Jakarta (ID): Erlangga. Terjemahan dari International Economics oleh Haris M.

Tarmidi, D. (2009). Aspek Politik dan Pemerintahan dalam Pemulihan Ekonomi Indonesia. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2012). Review of Maritime Transport 20. UNCTAD: Geneva.

Walsh, K. (2006). Trade in Service: Does Gravity Hold? A Gravity Model Approach to Estimating Barriers to Services Trade. Dublin: Dublin City University.

Wilson, J.S., C. Mann, and T. Otsuki. (2003). Trade Facilitation and Economic Development: A New Approach to Quantifying the Impact. The World Bank Review. 17: 367-389.

Wilson, J.S., C. Mann, and T. Otsuki. (2005). Assesing the Benefits of Trade Facilitation: A Global Perspective. The World Economy. 28: 841-871.

World Bank. (2012). World Development Indicators [Internet]. Diunduh tanggal 10 Mei 2013 dari [http://data.worldbank. org/data-catalog/world-developmentindicators]

Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI). (2012). Diunduh tanggal 8 Mei 2013 dari [http://www.wgi.org].

Zahidi, A. (2012). Dampak Trade Facilitation terhadap Arus Perdagangan di Kawasan ASEAN+3. Bogor: IPB.

Published
2013-12-31
How to Cite
Ayuwangi, A., & Widyastutik, . (2013). PENGARUH VARIABEL EKONOMI DAN NON EKONOMI TERHADAP IMPOR INDONESIA DARI ASEAN+6 MELALUI MODA TRANSPORTASI LAUT. Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan, 7(2), 231-248. https://doi.org/10.30908/bilp.v7i2.115
Section
Articles