Pemilihan Sistem Monitoring Organisasi dengan Technique For Others Reference By Similarity To Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)
Article Sidebar
Published:
Dec 29, 2020
Keywords:
organization, ideal solution, TOPSIS, monitoring
Main Article Content
Abstract
The covid pandemic in the world requires of social restrictions. Working from home is one solution in doing work. Every employee is required to contribute to the organization by always maintaining their performance. Therefore, monitoring is important to do to assess the performance results of these employees. Three monitoring alternatives are presented, namely, monitoring by means of self-uploading of performance results, monitoring with confirmation from supervisor and automatic monitoring applications during work implementation. The TOPSIS decision making method is used to select the three alternatives with 8 criteria. Based on the results of calculations and TOPSIS analysis, it was found that the automatic monitoring application during work was the best monitoring that needed to be made and to be implement. The value of relative proximity to the positive ideal solution of 0.63139.
Article Details
How to Cite
Primawati Utami, T. (2020). Pemilihan Sistem Monitoring Organisasi dengan Technique For Others Reference By Similarity To Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Cendekia Niaga, 4(2), 54-69. https://doi.org/10.52391/jcn.v4i2.504
Section
Articles
References
Afshari A, Mojahed M, Yusuff RM. 2010. Simple additive weighting approach to personnel selection problem. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology 1 (5): 511–514.
Aminbakhsh S, Gunduz M, Sonmez R. 2013. Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects. Journal of Safety Research 46: 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jsr.2013.05.003.
Aragones-Beltran P, Chaparro-Gonzálezb F, Pastor- Ferrandoc J-P, Pla-Rubioc A. 2014. An AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)/ANP (Analytic Network Process)-based multi-criteria decision approach for the selection of solar-thermal power plant investment projects. Energy 66 (1): 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. energy.2013.12.016.
Behzadiana M, Otaghsarab SK, Yazdanib M, Ignatiusc J. 2012. A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications 39(17):13051–13069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. eswa.2012.05.056.
Claudio D, Kremer GEO, Bravo-Llerena W, Freivalds A. 2014. A dynamic multi-attribute utility theory–based decision support system for patient prioritization in the emergency department. IIE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering 4 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19488300.2 013.879356.
Cho KT. 1998. Multicriteria Decision Methods: An Attempt To Evaluate and Unify. School of Systems Management Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University.
Daryanto, dkk. 2013. Pengantar Ilmu Manajemen dan Komunikasi. Prestasi Pustaka; Jakarta
Erizal, 2015, Pengantar Monitoring Pengendalian Proyek.
Hwang CL, Yoon K. 1981. Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-642-48318-9.
Hopfe CJ. 2009. Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis in Building Performance Simulation for Decision Support and Design Optimization, Issue 133, Retrieved Desember 1, 2015, from http:// alexandria.tue.nl/extra2/200911580.pdf.
Ishizakaa A, Pearmana C, Nemeryb P. 2012. AHP Sort: an AHP-based method for sorting problems. International Journal of Production Research 50 (17): 4767–4784. https://doi.org/10.1080/00 207543.2012.657966.
Jayalakshmi B, Pramod VR. 2015. Total interpretive structural modeling (TISM) of the enablers of a flexible control system for industry. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management 16(1): 63–85.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-014- 0080-y.
Jain V, Raj T. 2013. Evaluation of flexibility in FMS using SAW and WPM. Decision Science Letters 2(4):223–230. https://doi.org/10.5267/j. dsl.2013.06.003
Kadarsah S., 2002 , Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Suatu Wacana Struktural Idealisasi Dan Implementasi Konsep Pengambilan Keputusan. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya
Kurniasih, Tommy dan Maria M. Ratna Sari, 2013, Pengaruh Return On Assets, Leverage, Corporate Governance, Ukuran Perusahaan, dan Kompensasi Rugi Fiskal pada Tax Avoidance. Buletin Studi Ekonomi Vol 18, No.1, Halaman 58-65
Kusumadewi, S., Hartati, S., Harjoko, A., dan Wardoyo, R., 2006, Fuzzy Multi – Attribute Decision Making (FUZZY MADM). Yogyakarta : GrahaIlmu.
Liu P, Wang M. 2011. An extended VIKOR method for multiple attribute group decision making based on generalized interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Scientific Research and Essays 6(4):766–776.
Lofti FH, Fallahnejad R, Navidi N. 2011. Ranking efficient units in DEA by using topsis method. Applied Mathematical Sciences 5 (17): 805– 815.
Miles LD. 2015. Techniques of Value Analysis and Engineering. 3rd Edition. Portland: Lawrence D. Miles Value Foundation.
Moerdiyanto., 2009, Teknik monitoring dan evaluasi (monev) dalam rangka memperoleh informasi untuk pengambilan keputusan manajemen. Yogyakarta.
Mardani A. Zavadskas EK, Govindan K, Senin AA, Jusoh A. 2016. VIKOR technique: a systematic review of the state of the art literature on methodologies and applications. Sustainability 8(1):1–38. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010037.
Nuryanto, U.W. 2018. Human Capital Sebagai Pilar Esensial dalam Implementasi Quality Management System (QMS) ISO 9001:2015 pada Industri Kimia Sebagai Peningkat Daya Saing Dilihat dari Perspektif Teoritis. Jurnal JDM, vol. 1 no. 2, pp. 10-22.
Poduval PS, Pramod VR, Jagathy-Raj VP. 2015. Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and its application in analyzing factors inhibiting implementation of Total Productive Maintenance (TPM). International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 32(3): 308–331. https:// doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-06-2013-0090.
Peraturan Pemerintah nomor 39 tahun 2006 tentang Tata Cara Pengendalian dan Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Rencana Pembangunan.
Putra AA, Andreswari D, Susilo B. 2015. Sistem pendukung keputusan untuk penerima bantuan pinjaman samisake dengan metode electre (studi kasus: LKM Kelurahan Lingkar Timur Kota Bengkulu). Jurnal Rekursif 3(1):1–11.
Saaty TL. 2013. The modern science of multicriteria decision making and its practical applications: The AHP/ANP approach. Operations Research 61(5): 1101–1118. https://doi.org/10.1287/ opre.2013.1197.
Salehi A, Izadikhah M. 2014. A novel method to extend SAW for decision-making problems with interval data. Decision Science Letters 3(2): 225–236. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2013.11.001.
Surya C., 2018, Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS (Studi Kasus : Amik Mitra Gama), J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 322–329.
Tamiz M, Jones D, Romero C. 1998. Goal programming for decision making: an overview of the current state-of-the-art. European Journal of Operational Research 111: 569–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0377-2217(97)00317-2.
Utami, T.P, 2020, Pengendalian Pelaksanaan Kegiatan. Slide paparan materi Pelatihan Kepemimpinan Administrator. PKA Kemendikbud Agustus 2020.
Undang Undang nomor 28 tahun 1999 tentang Penyelenggaran negara yang bebas dari KKN
Wang L. 1997. A course in Fuzzy System Control. Prentice-Hall International, Inc., New Jersey.
Widianti, S, 2000, Pengantar Basis Data, Jakarta : Penerbit Fajar
Windarto A. P., 2017. “Implementasi Metode Topsis Dan Saw Dalam Memberikan Reward Pelanggan,” KLIK - Kumpul. J. ILMU Komput., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 88.
Wrihatnolo, R. (n.d.) 2008, Monitoring, evaluasi, dan pengendalian: Konsep dan pembahasan.
https://www.pengadaan.web.id/2016/08/cara-membuat-kurva-s-dalam-pekerjaan-konstruksi.html, diakses pada tanggal 2 September 2020
www.worldometers.info, iakses pada tanggal 5 November 2020
www.pengadaan.web.id, diakses pada tanggal 2 september 2020
Yang YP, Shieh HM, Leu JD, Tzeng GH. 2008. A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications. International Journal of Operations Research 5(3):160–168
Aminbakhsh S, Gunduz M, Sonmez R. 2013. Safety risk assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) during planning and budgeting of construction projects. Journal of Safety Research 46: 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jsr.2013.05.003.
Aragones-Beltran P, Chaparro-Gonzálezb F, Pastor- Ferrandoc J-P, Pla-Rubioc A. 2014. An AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)/ANP (Analytic Network Process)-based multi-criteria decision approach for the selection of solar-thermal power plant investment projects. Energy 66 (1): 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. energy.2013.12.016.
Behzadiana M, Otaghsarab SK, Yazdanib M, Ignatiusc J. 2012. A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications 39(17):13051–13069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. eswa.2012.05.056.
Claudio D, Kremer GEO, Bravo-Llerena W, Freivalds A. 2014. A dynamic multi-attribute utility theory–based decision support system for patient prioritization in the emergency department. IIE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering 4 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19488300.2 013.879356.
Cho KT. 1998. Multicriteria Decision Methods: An Attempt To Evaluate and Unify. School of Systems Management Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University.
Daryanto, dkk. 2013. Pengantar Ilmu Manajemen dan Komunikasi. Prestasi Pustaka; Jakarta
Erizal, 2015, Pengantar Monitoring Pengendalian Proyek.
Hwang CL, Yoon K. 1981. Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-642-48318-9.
Hopfe CJ. 2009. Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis in Building Performance Simulation for Decision Support and Design Optimization, Issue 133, Retrieved Desember 1, 2015, from http:// alexandria.tue.nl/extra2/200911580.pdf.
Ishizakaa A, Pearmana C, Nemeryb P. 2012. AHP Sort: an AHP-based method for sorting problems. International Journal of Production Research 50 (17): 4767–4784. https://doi.org/10.1080/00 207543.2012.657966.
Jayalakshmi B, Pramod VR. 2015. Total interpretive structural modeling (TISM) of the enablers of a flexible control system for industry. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management 16(1): 63–85.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-014- 0080-y.
Jain V, Raj T. 2013. Evaluation of flexibility in FMS using SAW and WPM. Decision Science Letters 2(4):223–230. https://doi.org/10.5267/j. dsl.2013.06.003
Kadarsah S., 2002 , Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Suatu Wacana Struktural Idealisasi Dan Implementasi Konsep Pengambilan Keputusan. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya
Kurniasih, Tommy dan Maria M. Ratna Sari, 2013, Pengaruh Return On Assets, Leverage, Corporate Governance, Ukuran Perusahaan, dan Kompensasi Rugi Fiskal pada Tax Avoidance. Buletin Studi Ekonomi Vol 18, No.1, Halaman 58-65
Kusumadewi, S., Hartati, S., Harjoko, A., dan Wardoyo, R., 2006, Fuzzy Multi – Attribute Decision Making (FUZZY MADM). Yogyakarta : GrahaIlmu.
Liu P, Wang M. 2011. An extended VIKOR method for multiple attribute group decision making based on generalized interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Scientific Research and Essays 6(4):766–776.
Lofti FH, Fallahnejad R, Navidi N. 2011. Ranking efficient units in DEA by using topsis method. Applied Mathematical Sciences 5 (17): 805– 815.
Miles LD. 2015. Techniques of Value Analysis and Engineering. 3rd Edition. Portland: Lawrence D. Miles Value Foundation.
Moerdiyanto., 2009, Teknik monitoring dan evaluasi (monev) dalam rangka memperoleh informasi untuk pengambilan keputusan manajemen. Yogyakarta.
Mardani A. Zavadskas EK, Govindan K, Senin AA, Jusoh A. 2016. VIKOR technique: a systematic review of the state of the art literature on methodologies and applications. Sustainability 8(1):1–38. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010037.
Nuryanto, U.W. 2018. Human Capital Sebagai Pilar Esensial dalam Implementasi Quality Management System (QMS) ISO 9001:2015 pada Industri Kimia Sebagai Peningkat Daya Saing Dilihat dari Perspektif Teoritis. Jurnal JDM, vol. 1 no. 2, pp. 10-22.
Poduval PS, Pramod VR, Jagathy-Raj VP. 2015. Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and its application in analyzing factors inhibiting implementation of Total Productive Maintenance (TPM). International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 32(3): 308–331. https:// doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-06-2013-0090.
Peraturan Pemerintah nomor 39 tahun 2006 tentang Tata Cara Pengendalian dan Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Rencana Pembangunan.
Putra AA, Andreswari D, Susilo B. 2015. Sistem pendukung keputusan untuk penerima bantuan pinjaman samisake dengan metode electre (studi kasus: LKM Kelurahan Lingkar Timur Kota Bengkulu). Jurnal Rekursif 3(1):1–11.
Saaty TL. 2013. The modern science of multicriteria decision making and its practical applications: The AHP/ANP approach. Operations Research 61(5): 1101–1118. https://doi.org/10.1287/ opre.2013.1197.
Salehi A, Izadikhah M. 2014. A novel method to extend SAW for decision-making problems with interval data. Decision Science Letters 3(2): 225–236. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2013.11.001.
Surya C., 2018, Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS (Studi Kasus : Amik Mitra Gama), J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 322–329.
Tamiz M, Jones D, Romero C. 1998. Goal programming for decision making: an overview of the current state-of-the-art. European Journal of Operational Research 111: 569–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0377-2217(97)00317-2.
Utami, T.P, 2020, Pengendalian Pelaksanaan Kegiatan. Slide paparan materi Pelatihan Kepemimpinan Administrator. PKA Kemendikbud Agustus 2020.
Undang Undang nomor 28 tahun 1999 tentang Penyelenggaran negara yang bebas dari KKN
Wang L. 1997. A course in Fuzzy System Control. Prentice-Hall International, Inc., New Jersey.
Widianti, S, 2000, Pengantar Basis Data, Jakarta : Penerbit Fajar
Windarto A. P., 2017. “Implementasi Metode Topsis Dan Saw Dalam Memberikan Reward Pelanggan,” KLIK - Kumpul. J. ILMU Komput., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 88.
Wrihatnolo, R. (n.d.) 2008, Monitoring, evaluasi, dan pengendalian: Konsep dan pembahasan.
https://www.pengadaan.web.id/2016/08/cara-membuat-kurva-s-dalam-pekerjaan-konstruksi.html, diakses pada tanggal 2 September 2020
www.worldometers.info, iakses pada tanggal 5 November 2020
www.pengadaan.web.id, diakses pada tanggal 2 september 2020
Yang YP, Shieh HM, Leu JD, Tzeng GH. 2008. A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications. International Journal of Operations Research 5(3):160–168