Evaluasi Penyelenggaraan Webinar: Strategi UMKM Korea Selatan Bertahan Dalam Pandemi COVID-19

Main Article Content

Nadya Megawati Rachman


One of the economic sectors that has been significantly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia is the middle and lower class businesses, which are often referred to as Medium, Small and Micro Enterprises (MSMEs). The Trade Education and Training Center, has an important role in being able to contribute to the wider community, by providing information and knowledge and new enthusiasm in facing this pandemic, one of which is for MSMEs in Indonesia by holding various trainings and seminars which are held online (webinars) which accessible to all MSME players in Indonesia. Pusdiklat Trade held a webinar with the theme "Strategies for South Korean MSMEs to Survive the COVID-19 Pandemic" with resource persons the Head of ITPC (Indonesia Trade Promotion Center) Busan - South Korea using the Kudagang LMS (Learning Management System). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation of knowledge sharing using the distance learning method (e-learning) by utilizing the Kudagang LMS using the CIPP (Context, Input, Process and Product) evaluation approach. The research method used is quantitative methods through surveys using questionnaires and qualitative descriptive approaches through scientific literature review. The results showed that the average score of the participants' evaluation of the webinar was in the good and satisfying category. Although there are still several components that need to be improved, this webinar activity is feasible to continue with different materials and sources and is targeted at participating stakeholders from various stakeholders related to the duties and functions of the Trade Education and Training Center, both ASN and non ASN as centers of excellence for trade people in Indonesia.

Article Details



Alkin, M. C. (2004). Evaluation roots: Tracking theorists’ views and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Arikunto, S., & Jabar, C. S. A. (2008). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman Teoretis Praktis bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.
Diandra, Lady, & Rahmatullah, Y. F. (2020). Result of Survey on Impact of COVID-19 on Youth Entrepreneurs in Indonesia Entrepreneurs (Issue June 2020-UNDP). https://www.undp.org/content/dam/indonesia/2020/DOCS/INS-Report-survey-on-impact-of-COVID19-to-YE-in-Indonesia.pdf
Djaali, & Muljono, P. (2004). Pengukuran Dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Grasindo : Jakarta.
Donaldson, S. I., Patton, M. Q., Fetterman, D. M., & Scriven, M. (2010). The 2009 Claremont Debates: The Promise and Pitfalls of Utilization-Focused and Empowerment Evaluation. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 6(13), 15–57. http://www.davidfetterman.com/ClaremontDebate.pdf
Durahman, N., & Noer, Z. M. (2019). Aplikasi Seminar Online (Webinar) Untuk Pembinaan Wirausaha Baru. Jurnal Manajemen Informatika, 6(2), 111–120.
Fatmawati, S. (2019). Efektivitas Forum Diskusi Pada E-Learning Berbasis Moodle Untuk Meningkatkan Partisipasi Belajar. REFLEKSI EDUKATIKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 9(2), 211–216. http://jurnal.umk.ac.id/index.php/RE
Felix, J. L. (1979). Research and evaluation to improve instruction: The Cincinnati strategy. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 1(2), 57–62.
Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2004). Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. Pearson Education Inc.: Boston.
Gerald, E., Obianuju, A., & Chukwunonso, N. (2020). Strategic agility and performance of small and medium enterprises in the phase of Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, 2(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.35912/ijfam.v2i1.163
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Countenances of Fourth-Generation Evaluation : Description,Judgment, and Negotiation. Sage Publication Inc.: California.
Harumiaty, N. (2013). Belajar Mandiri Menggunakan Webinar Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Pustakawan Di Indonesia. JPUA Jurnal Perpustakaan Universitas Airlangga, 3(1), 33–37.
Izza, S., Ningrum, B. S., & Hariyati, R. T. S. (2019). Pemanfaatan Webinar dalam Bidang Keperawatan. Jurnal Penelitian Perawat Profesional, 1(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.37287/jppp.v1i1.14
Madaus, G. F., Scriven, M., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation. Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing : Boston.
Mahmudi, I. (2011). CIPP: Suatu Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jurnal At-Ta’dib, 6(1), 118.
Mansyur, A. I., Purnamasari, R., & Kusuma, R. M. (2019). WEBINAR SEBAGAI MEDIA BIMBINGAN KLASIKAL SEKOLAH UNTUK PENDIDIKAN SEKSUAL BERBASIS ONLINE (Meta Analisis Pedagogi Online). Jurnal Suloh: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Universitas Syiah Kuala, 4(1), 26–30.
Matthews, J. M., & Hudson, A. M. (2001). Guidelines for evaluating parent training projects. Family Relations, 50(1), 77–86.
Nicholson, T. (1989). Using the CIPP model to evaluate reading instruction. Journal of Reading, 32(4), 312–318.
Owen, J. M. (1993). Evaluation Programs : Forms and Approaches. Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd.: St. Leonard.
Patton, M. Q. (2000). Overview: Language matters. New Directions for Evaluation, 2000(86), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1168
Sarwono, H. A. (2015). Profil Bisnis Usaha Mikro, Kecil Dan Menengah (UMKM). In Bank Indonesia dan LPPI. Bank Indonesia : Jakarta.
Silvianita, S., & Yulianto, E. (2020). Webinar Sebagai Kegiatan Peningkatan Kompetensi. Paedagoria: Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Kependidikan, 6356, 113–119.
Steinert, Y., Cruess, S., Cruess, R., & Snell, L. (2005). Faculty development for teaching and evaluating professionalism: From project design to curriculum change. Medical Education, 39(2), 127–136.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In The international handbook of educational evaluation. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (1986). Systematic Evaluation: A Self Instructional Guide to Theory and Practice. Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing : Boston.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, & applications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sudjiono, A. (2005). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Raja Grafindo Persada : Jakarta.
Sürücü, L., & Maslakci, A. (2020). Validity and Reliability In Quantitative Research. Bussiness & Management Studies : An International Journal, 8(3), 2694–2726.
Triyono, S. (2020). Mengukur Efektifitas Webinar. Media Indonesia. https://mediaindonesia.com/read/detail/331111-mengukur-efektivitas-webinar (Diakses pada: 2020-10-02)
Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (1990). Educational Measurement and Testing. Massachusetts.
Winarno, W., & Setiawan, J. (2013). Penerapan Sistem E-Learning pada Komunitas Pendidikan Sekolah Rumah (Home Schooling). Jurnal ULTIMA InfoSys, 4(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.31937/si.v4i1.241
Zhang, G., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Zeller, N., Misulis, K., Shea, D., & Williams, J. (2009). Assessing service and learning of a service-learning program in teacher education using mixed-methods research. Paper Presented at the American Education Research Association Annual Conference.
Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D., Williams, J., Shea, C., & Misulis, K. (2011). Using the CIPP Evaluation Model as a Comprehensive Framework. Journal of Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57–84.