THE IMPACT OF WORLD CPO PRICE CHANGE TOWARDS PRICES, ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES, AND INCOME DISTRIBUTION IN INDONESIA

  • Wisnu Winardi BPS-Statistics Indonesia
  • Hadi Susanto BPS-Statistics Indonesia
  • Kadim Martana Ministry of Environment and Forestry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30908/bilp.v11i2.66
Abstract Views: 929 | PDF Downloads: 609

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  
Keywords: CPO World Price, CGE Models, Price Taker, Price Influencer

Abstract

Paper ini menganalisis dampak perubahan harga CPO dunia terhadap harga-harga, aktivitas ekonomi, dan distribusi pendapatan rumah tangga di Indonesia dengan pendekatan model CGE. Model pertama mengasumsikan Indonesia tidak mampu memengaruhi harga, sedangkan model kedua mengasumsikan Indonesia mampu memengaruhi harga. Data utama yang digunakan bersumber dari Tabel Sistem Neraca Sosial Ekonomi Indonesia tahun 2008. Hasil simulasi menunjukkan bahwa apabila Indonesia berperan sebagai penerima harga, peningkatan harga CPO dunia diperkirakan akan berdampak pada penguatan nilai tukar, penurunan tingkat harga, dan meningkatkan aktivitas ekonomi, namun sedikit mengurangi kemerataan distribusi pendapatan. Di sisi lain, penurunan harga CPO dunia akan memberikan dampak yang sebaliknya. Apabila Indonesia dapat berperan memengaruhi harga, perubahan harga CPO dunia diperkirakan akan berdampak sama dengan bila Indonesia tidak dapat memengaruhi harga, namun dengan nilai perubahan yang relatif lebih kecil. Hasil ini mengindikasikan bahwa Indonesia sebaiknya dapat berperan sebagai penerima harga ketika harga CPO dunia bertendensi meningkat dan berperan memengahuhi harga ketika harga CPO dunia bertendensi turun.

 

This paper analyzes the impact of world CPO change price towards prices, economic activities, and household income distribution using CGE Models. The first model assumes that Indonesia is a price taker, while the second model assumes that Indonesia could influence the price. The main data were taken from Indonesian Social Accounting Matrix 2008. The simulation results suggest that if Indonesia takes the role as a price taker, an increase in world CPO price will affect exchange rate, decrease prices, and improve economic activities, but it slightly worsened household income distribution. On the other hand, a decrease in world CPO price will bring about the opposite impacts respectively. Conversely, if Indonesia takes the role as a main price influencer, world CPO price change will lead to a similar result with less magnitude impacts. These findings suggest that Indonesia should be able to take the role as a price taker when world CPO price is increasing and as a main price influencer when world CPO price is decreasing.

References

Agustira, M.A. and A. Jatmika. (2010). Membentuk Harga Referensi CPO Dunia di Indonesia. Warta Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Vol. 32 (6), pp.16-18.

Al-mulali, U., C.N.B.C. Sab. (2012). Oil Price and The Real Exchange Rate in Oil Exporting Countries. OPEC Energy Review, Vol. 36, pp. 375-382.

Appleyard, D.R., Field, A.J.JR., Cobb, S.L. (2008). International Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Aprina, H. (2014). The Impact of Crude Palm Oil Price on Rupiah’s Rate. Bulletin of Monetary, Economics and Banking, Vol. 16 (4), pp 295-314.

Ashfahany, A. E. and M. F. Priyatna. (2015). Analysis of World Crude Palm Oil Prices on the Real Exchange Rate: A Case Study of Indonesia and Malaysia. Paper: presented on International Conference on Trends in Business and Economics on May 29-30, 2015 at Holiday Inn Express London (UK).

Aziz, M.I.A and S-D. Applanaidu. (2017). Effects of Palm Oil Price on Exchange Rate: A Case Study of Malaysia and Indonesia. Institutions and Economies, Vol 9 (4), pp. 71-87.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2010). Sistem Neraca Sosial Ekonomi Indonesia 2008. Jakarta: CV. Dharma Putra.

Bergmann, D., D. O’Connor, and A. Thümmel. (2016). An Analysis of Price and Volatility Transmission in Butter, Palm Oil and Crude Oil Markets. Agricultural and Food Economic, Vol. 4, pp. 1-23.

Bhattacharyya, S. And JG. Williamson. (2016). Distributional Consequences of Commodity Price Shocks: Australia Over a Century. The Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 62, pp. 223-244.

Bodart, V. B. Candelon; J-F. Carpantier. (2012). Real Exchanges Rates in Commodity Producing Countries: A Reappraisal. Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol. 31, pp. 1482-1502.

GTAP. (2017). GTAP Models: Computable General Equilibrium Modeling and GTAP. Downloaded on May 2, 2017 from https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/models/cge_gtap_n.asp.

Harjanti, M. (2012). The Impact of Palm Oil Price Swings on Household Welfare: The Case of Indonesia. Research Paper. Institute of Social Studies, The Hague, The Netherlands.

Hosoe, N., K. Gasawa, and H. Hashimoto. (2010). Textbook of Computable General Equilibrium: Programming and Simulations. Great Britain: Palgrave Macmillan.

ICDX. (2015). News and Updates. Downloaded on December 30, 2015, from http://www.icdx.co.id/newsandupdate/detail/indonesia_harus_menjadi_acuan_sawit_dunia.

International Monetary Fund. (2015). World Economic Outlook: Adjusting to Lower Commodity Prices. Washington.

Iskandar, A. (2015). Dampak Perubahan Harga Crude Palm Oil (CPO) Dunia Terhadap Value Ekspor Komoditas Kelapa Sawit dan Perekonomian Indonesia (Pendekatan Vector Autoregression Analysis). Jurnal Info Arta STAN, Vol. 2, pp. 1-17.

Kitous, A., B. Saveyn, K. Keramidas, T. Vandyck, RL. Santos, K. Wojtowicz. (2016). Impact of Low Oil Prices on Oil Exporting Countries. JRC Science for Policy Report; EUR 27909 EN; doi: 10.2791/718384.

OECD. (2013). Glossary of Statistical Terms: Activity. Downloaded on May 3, 2017 from https://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=30.

Office of Chief Economist. (2015). Indonesia Update. Downloaded on July 13, 2017, from http://mandiri-institute.id/indonesia-update-2015/?upf=dl&id=1495.

Oktaviani, R. (2008). Model Teori Ekonomi Keseimbangan Umum: Teori dan Aplikasinya di Indonesia. Bogor: Departemen Ilmu Ekonomi Fakultas Ekonomi IPB.

PT. Smart Tbk. (2015). International CPO prices. Downloaded on December 1, 2016, from http://www.smart-tbk.com/ir_international_prices.php.

Quero-Virla, L. (2016). Macroeconomic Effects of Oil Price Fluctuations in Colombia. Ecos de Economía: A Latin American Journal of Applied Economics, Vol. 20, pp. 23-38.

Rahardja, S., E. Aldaz-Carroll, and M.S. Lauro. (2010). Managing Commodity Price Shocks in Indonesia, in: Bank, Boom, Bust and Up Again? Evolution, Drivers and Impact of Commodity Prices: Implications for Indonesia. A Trade Development Report, Vol. 2 (58831). Jakarta: The World Bank Office Jakarta.

Rahman, AKA. (2017). Impact of Palm Oil Supply and Demand on Crude palm Oil Price Behavior. Downloaded on May 10, 2017 from http://www.pointers.org.my/slide/slide116.pdf.

Robinson, S. (2006). Macro Models and Multipliers: Leontief, Stone, Keynes, and CGE Models. Poverty, Inequality, and Development. In de Janvry, A. & Kanbur, R. (Ed.). Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-being, Vol. 1 (pp. 205-232). New York: Springer Science.

Teguh, D. (2010). Volatility of World Rice Prices, Import Tariffs and Poverty in Indonesia: a CGE-Microsimulation Analysis. MPRA Paper 31451. Downloaded on February 7, 2012, from http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/31451/1/MPRA_paper _31451.pdf.

Tempo. (2017). Indonesia, Malaysia Poised to Set World CPO Price. Downloaded on May 2, 2017 from https://en.tempo.co/read/news/2017/04/23/056868763/Indonesia-Malaysia-Poised-to-Set-World-CPO-Price.

UN Comtrade. (2015). International Trade Data. Downloaded on December 28, 2015, from http://comtrade.un.org/data/.

Winardi, W. (2013). Dampak Kenaikan Harga Kedelai Dunia dan Penghapusan Tarif Impor Kedelai Terhadap Kesejahteraan Masyarakat. Jurnal BPPK, Vol. 6 (1), pp. 15-28.

World Bank. (2016). Commodity Markets. Downloaded on December 1, 2016, from http://www.worldbank.org/en/research/commodity-markets.

Published
2017-12-31
How to Cite
Winardi, W., Susanto, H., & Martana, K. (2017). THE IMPACT OF WORLD CPO PRICE CHANGE TOWARDS PRICES, ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES, AND INCOME DISTRIBUTION IN INDONESIA. Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan, 11(2), 207-226. https://doi.org/10.30908/bilp.v11i2.66
Section
Articles