ANALISIS DAYA SAING DAN KESIAPAN INDONESIA DALAM RANGKA INTEGRASI ASEAN : STUDI KASUS AUTOMOTIVES, RUBBER BASED, DAN AGRO BASED PRODUCTS

  • Adrian D. Lubis Kementerian Perdagangan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30908/bilp.v5i1.117
Abstract Views: 757 | PDF Downloads: 519

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  
Keywords: IIt, Revealed comparative Advantage Bilateral, Liberalisasi

Abstract

In AseAN economic community-Aec by 2015, Indonesia is predicted still left behind in competitiveness from other AseAN countries, particularly singapore, malaysia and thailand. Based on the AseAN trade data base, Indonesia has only 2 sector industry which have competitiveness from the 12 priority sector in Aec’s blue print. this paper aims, firstly, to analyse the impact of integration among AseAN countries on the performance of industrial linkages automotives, rubber based, agro based products in Indonesia. secondly, to determine the impact of liberalization among AseAN countries on a map of the competitiveness of automotives industry, rubber based, agro based products in Indonesia, thirdly, to know how the readiness the trade facilitation in sectors priority of automotives, rubber based and agro based products, and finally to determine the policy formulation of the priority sector in the preparation of the implementation of the Aec. the result suggest that almost of 3 industries, Indonesia is with low level IIt and competitiveness (RcAB). moreover, Indonesia still attracts FdI in order to increase the performance of IIt dan RcAB.

Author Biography

Adrian D. Lubis, Kementerian Perdagangan

Pusat Kebijakan Kerjasama Perdagangan Internasional, Badan Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Kebijakan Perdagangan

References

ASEAN Secretariat. (2009). AseAN merchandise trade statistics database. www.aseansec.org

Balassa, B. (1967). trade Liberalization and Revealed comparative Advantage. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 33, 99-123.

Brulhart, Marius. dan Thorpe, Michael. (1999). East-Asian Export Growth, Intra-Industry Trade and Adjustmen. Asia Pacific Journal of Economics and Business, 3(2): 34-47.

Faustino, Horacio. (2008). Intra- Industry trade and Revealed comparative Advantage: An Inverted-u Relationship . School of Economics and Management, Technical University of Lisbon, Working Paper Series.

Grubel, H. and P. Lloyd, (1971). the empirical measurement of Intra- Industry trade . The

economic Record 47, pp.494-517

Rachmawati. (2008). Dampak Skala Ekonomi Terhadap Perdagangan Intra-Industri Antara Indonesia dan Thailand: Kajian Kasus Industri Mobil Tahun 1995-2007

Tambunan, Tulus T.H, (2003). Perkembangan Sektor Pertanian di Indonesia, Beberapa Isu Penting. Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.

Sahin, S.O., Ulengin, F., Ulusoy, G., Aktas, E., Kabak, O., Topcu, I.y. (2006). A New Perspective in competitiveness on Nations . Department of Industrial Engineering, Dogus University Istanbul. Turkey

Vogiatzoglou. (2005). varieties or Qualities? Horizontal and vertical Intra-industri trade within the NAFtA trade Bloc.

World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS). (2010). UNCOMTRADE Database.

Published
2011-07-31
How to Cite
Lubis, A. D. (2011). ANALISIS DAYA SAING DAN KESIAPAN INDONESIA DALAM RANGKA INTEGRASI ASEAN : STUDI KASUS AUTOMOTIVES, RUBBER BASED, DAN AGRO BASED PRODUCTS. Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan, 5(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.30908/bilp.v5i1.117
Section
Articles