LIBERALISASI PERDAGANGAN SEKTOR JASA TRANSPORTASI UDARA ASEAN DAN ASEAN FTA PARTNERS: MODEL IC-IRTS CGE
Abstract Views: 463 |
PDF
Downloads: 1039
Downloads
Abstract
Abstrak
Pertumbuhan populasi, peningkatan kesejahteraan ekonomi serta letak geografis Indonesia yang unik meningkatkan “kecenderungan untuk melakukan penerbangan”. Dengan pertimbangan tersebut, jasa transportasi udara merupakan sarana yang amat penting dan efisien dalam menghubungkan hampir 240 juta penduduk Indonesia, maupun penduduk di belahan dunia lainnya. Seperti pada sektor jasa lainnya, hambatan perdagangan di sektor jasa transportasi udara diimplementasikan melalui kebijakan pemerintah melalui berbagai regulasi. Hal ini menyebabkan berbagai regulasi menjadi penghambat karena regulasi tersebut meningkatkan biaya transaksi yang pada akhirnya dibebankan ke konsumen dalam bentuk harga jasa yang lebih tinggi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) mengestimasi tarif ekuivalen dari NTBs dan (2) menganalisis dampak eliminasi hambatan regulasi di sektor jasa transportasi udara dalam lingkup ASEAN dan ASEAN FTA Partners. Dengan menggunakan model gravity, teridentifikasi bahwa hambatan perdagangan di jasa transportasi udara ASEAN dan ASEAN FTA Partners masih relatif tinggi yaitu antara 0 – 11.2%. Dengan menggunakan CGE model IC-IRTS, simulasi GTAP menunjukkan bahwa hasil penelitian ini konsisten dengan teori pro-kompetitif. Gain yang lebih besar diperoleh dari model CGE yang menggunakan asumsi IC-IRTS dibandingkan PC-CRTS. Dengan asumsi IC-IRTS, China memperoleh manfaat yang lebih besar yang diindikasikan dengan peningkatan kesejahteraan paling tinggi.
Abstract
Population growth, increased economic welfare, and Indonesia's unique geographical location increase the "tendency to travel by air transportation". Based on these conditions, air transport is a fundamental and efficient way to connect almost 240 million Indonesians, and people in other parts of the world. However, like other service sector, trade barriers in the air transportation service is implemented through government policies through regulations. This condition causes the regulations to be barriers because they increase transaction costs charged to consumers in the form of higher service prices. This study aims to (1) estimate the tax-equivalent of NTBs and (2) analyze the impact of eliminating regulatory barriers in the air transportation service within the scope of ASEAN and ASEAN FTA Partners. Using the gravity model, this study identifies that the trade barriers of air transportation services in ASEAN and ASEAN FTA Partners are still relatively high at between 0 - 11.2 percent. Using CGE's IC-IRTS model, GTAP simulation shows that the results of this study are consistent with pro-competitive theories. Greater gain is obtained from the CGE model, which uses the assumption of IC-IRTS compared to PC-CRTS. Assuming IC-IRTS, China will reap greater benefits as indicated by its highest increase in welfare.
JEL Classification: F13, F15, F17
References
Amala, F., Heriqbaldi, U. (2015). Dampak Keterbukaan Perdagangan Sektor Jasa Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi: Pendekatan Panel Dinamis. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, No. 2. 114-124.
Anderson, J., E. & Van Wincoop, E. (2001). Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle. NBER Working Paper, No.8079.
Anderson, J.E, Millot C. A, Yotov Y. (2014). How Much Does Geography Deflect Services Trade? Canadian Answers. International Economics Review 55 791-818.
Anggoro & Widyastutik. (2016). Non-Tariff Barrier and factors that Influence the Indonesian Cocoa Export to Europa. Signifikan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi. Vol 5(2) October 2016.
Behar & Venables. (2010). Transport Cost and International Trade. Economics Series Working Paper 488. Oxford: University of Oxford Department of Economics.
Benz, S. (2017). Services Trade Cost: Tariff Equivalents of Services Trade Restrictions Using Gravity Estimation. OECD Trade Policy Papers. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Callaghan, B., A. & Uprasen, U. (2008). Impact of the Fifth EU Enlargement on ASEAN. Ireland: Euro-Asia Centre (EAC), Departement of Economics Kemmy Business School University of Limerick.
Cusolito A.P, Hollweg C.H. (2015). Trade Policy Barriers: An Obstacle to Export Diversification in Eurasia. Journal of Banking and Financial Economics 2:91-129.
De Melo, J. (1988). CGE Models for The Analysis of Trade Policy in Developing Countries. Policy Research Working Paper Series 3, The World Bank.
Elbehri dan Hertel. (2006). A Comparative Analysis of The EU-Morocco vs Multilateral Liberalization. Journal of Economic Integration Vol. 21 496-525.
Elkhoury, Antoine C., & Andreas Savvides. (2006). Openness in Services Trafe and Economic Growth. Economic Letters 92, pp. 277-283.
Fairbanks, M. (2012). Lalu Lintas Bertumbuh, Kebutuhan Bertumbuh. Jurnal Prakarsa Infrastruktur Indonesia. Edisi 9 Januari 2012.
Fawaiq, M. (2014). Peluang Ekspor Jasa Indonesia ke Jepang Melalui Mode 3 (Commercial Presence) dan Model 4 (Movement of Natural Persons) pada Kerjasama IJEPA. Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan. 8(1): 25-50.
Fontagne, L., Guillin A., & Mitaritonna, C. (2009). Assessment of Tariff Equivalents for Services Considering Zero Trade Flows. CEPII No 2011 24 December
Fontagné, Lionel, Amélie Guillin, & Cristina Mitaritonna. (2011). Estimations of Tariff Equivalents for the Services Sector. CEPII Working Paper No. 2011–24. Paris: Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales.
Francois, J., F. (1998). Scale Economies and Imperfect Competition in the GTAP Model. GTAP Technical Paper No. 14.
Francois, J.F. & D. Roland-Holst. (1997). Scale Economies and Imperfect Competition. In J.F. Francois and K.A. Reinert. Eds. Applied Methods for Trade Policy Analysis: A Handbook. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Francois, J. (2001). The Next WTO Round: North-South Stakes in New Market Acces Negotiations. Adelaide: Centre for International Economic Studies.
Grunfeld, L.A. & A. Moxnes. (2003). The Intangible Globalization: Explaining the Patterns of International Trade in Services. Discussion Paper, 657.
Hayami, Y & Godo, Y. (2005). Development Economics. From the Poverty to The Wealth of Nations. Third Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hertel, T.W. (2000). GTAP Tutorial. Website: www.gtap.org.
Hertel, T., Anderson, K., Francois, J. & Martin, W. (1999). Agriculture and Non-Agricultural Liberalisation in the Millenium Round. Paper presented at the Global Conference on Agriculture and the New Trade Agenda from a Development Perspective: Interests and Options in the WTO 2000 Negotiations. Geneva: World Bank and WTO.
IATA. (2015). Annual Review IATA. 71st Annual General Meeting. Miami: IATA.
Ihsan, M. (2019). Ekuvalen Tarif dan Determinan Impor Jasa Transportasi Udara Negara Anggota ASEAN dengan Taiwan. Skripsi. Bogor: IPB.
ITAPS dan Kementerian Perdagangan. (2019). Review Hasil Perundingan Kerjasama Perdagangan Internasional. Laporan Penelitian. Tidak Dipublikasikan. Jakarta: ITAPS Kemendag.
Jager, H. and Lanjouw, G. (1977). An Alternative Method for Quantifying International Trade Barriers. Review of World Economics. Vol.113, issues 4, pages 719-740.
Kalirajan, K. (2000). Restrictions on Trade in Distribution Services. Productivity Comissions Staff Research Paper. Canberra: Ausinfo.
Lejour, A.M., de Mooij, R.A. Nahuis, R. (2001). EU: Enlargement: Economic Implication for Countries and Industries. CPB Document 11. CPB Netherland Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
Li, K., Song, L., & Zao, X. (2007). Component Trade and China’s Global Economic Integration in Garnauts and Song (Eds), China Linking Markets for Growth. Canberra: ANU E Press.
Marannu, M.N. (2010). Singapura dan Kerjasama Open Sky di ASEAN. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.
Meidah. (2016). Ekuivalen Tarif dan Determinan Impor Jasa Finansial dan Asuransi Negara RCEP. Skripsi. Bogor: IPB.
Meidah & Widyastutik. (2016). Determinan dan Ekuivalen Tarif Impor Jasa Finansial dan Asuransi negara RCEP. Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan. Vol. 10, No. 2, Desember 2016.
Mirza, D & Nicoletti, G. (2006). What is So Special About Trade in Services. Research Paper 2004,2, diunduh pada tanggal 5 November 2015. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228238672_What_is_So_Special_About_Trade_in_Services.
Mishra, S., Susanna L., Rahul A. (2011). Services Export Shopistication and Economic Growth. Policy Research Working Paper 5606. Washington D.C.: The World Bank South Asia Region Economic Policy and Poverty.
Pannenungi, M., A. (2004). Model CGE dengan Skala Ekonomi yang Meningkat dan Persaingan Tidak Sempurna: Aplikasi pada Studi Kawasan Perdagangan ASEAN-China. Disertasi. Depok: FE UI.
Park, S., C. (2002). Measuring Tariff Equivalent in Cross Border Trade in Services. KIEP Working Paper 02-15, Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
Pellan, M.I., & Wong M., H. (2010). Trade Facilitation in ASEAN+6 Economies: Provisions in FTAs, Performance and The Way Forward in ASEAN and Regional Free Trade Agreements Edited by Christopher Findlay. Routledge-ERIA Studies in Development Economics.
Pham VN, N T Dao, & Q H Doan. (2014). Analyzing the Determinants of Services Trade Flows Between Vietnam adn European Union: A Gravity Model Approach. Hanoi (VN): Hanoi National University.
Prakarsa. (2012). Infrastruktur Penerbangan: Tinjauan ke Masa Depan. Jurnal Prakasa Infrastruktur Indonesia. Edisi 9, Januari 2012.
Rahardjo, S. (2004). Ilmu Hukum: Pencarian, Pembebasan, dan Pencerahan. Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadiyah.
Rofifah, N. (2017). Ekuivalen Tarif dan Determinan Impor Jasa Telekomunikasi Negara APEC. Skripsi. Bogor: IPB.
Rose, A., K. (2002). Estimating Protectionism through Residuals from the Gravity Model. Berkeley: University of California.
Saptanto, S., Rahadian, R., Tajerin. (2017). Dampak Hambatan Non Tarif Terhadap Kinerja Makroekonomi dari Sektor Perikanan dengan Menggunakan Model GTAP. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan. 12(1): 75-91.
Sari, KR., Widyastutik. (2015). Faktor yang Mempengaruhi dan Estimasi Ekuivalen Tarif NTBs Ekspor Kayu Lapis Indonesia. Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan. 9(1): 95-108.
Sohn, Chan-Hyun. (2005). Does the Gravity Model Explain South Korea’s Trade Flows? Japanese Economic Review, Volume 56, Issues 4, pages 417-430.
Stern, R. & B. Hoekman. (1988). The Service Sektor in Economic Structure and in International Transactions. in L. Castle and C. Findlay (eds.), Pacific Trade in Services. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Tan, AK. (2012). Toward a Single Aviation Market in ASEAN: Regulatory Reform and Industry Challenges. Discussion Paper. Singapura: National University of Singapore.
Walsh, K. (2006). Trade in Services: Does Gravity Hold? A Gravity Model Approach to Estimating Barriers to Services. Institute for International Integration Studies (IIIS) Discussion Paper. No 183/October 2006.
Whalley, J. (2004). Assessing the Benefits to Developing Countries to Liberalisation in Services Trade. The World Economy, Vol.27 (8), pp.1223-1253.
Whittle, C. (2012). Open Sky dan Maskapai Penerbangan Indonesia. Jurnal Prakarsa Infrastruktur Indonesia. Edisi 9 Januari 2012.
Widyastutik. (2016). Dampak Ekonomi Hambatan Regulasi Perdagangan Sektor Jasa Transportasi: Kasus ASEAN dan ASEAN’s Dialogue Partner. Disertasi. Depok: UI.
Widyastutik, Nazara, S., Oktaviani, R., Simarmata, D. (2017). Trade Barier Elimination, Economics of Scale, and Market Competition: Computable General Equilibrium Model diunduh pada 5 Mei 2019 (http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/signifikan/article/view/52790029
Winchester, N. (2008). Is There Are Dirty Little Secret? Non Tariff Barriers and The Gain From Trade. Dunedin: University of Otago.
Woolridge. (2006). Introduction Econometric. Thomson South-Western.
Yeah, K.L., Yanagida, J., F., Yamauchi, H. (1994). Evaluation of External Market Effects and Government Intervention in Malaysia Agriculture Sector, A Computable General Equilibrium Framework. Agric Econ. 11(2-3), 237-256.
Copyright (c) 2020 Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan
