ANALISIS KEIKUTSERTAAN INDONESIA DALAM INISIATIF SEKTORAL UNTUK PRODUK PERIKANAN, KIMIA DAN KEHUTANAN

  • Adrian D. Lubis Kementerian Perdagangan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30908/bilp.v2i1.164
Abstract Views: 348 | PDF Downloads: 196

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
  
Keywords: Fisheries Product, Chemical Product, Forestry Product

Abstract

Sectoral initiative is an alternative to obtain better market access through the deletion of tariffs for some products or certain sectors. The negotiations sectoral initiatives consists of 12 sectors, but in this study only focuses on three main sectors, namely fisheries, chemical and forestry. The analysis performed in this study using three approaches: 1. Effective Rate Protection (ERP; 2. Constant Market Share Analysis (CMSA); and 3. General Equilibrium Models. The study found that the fisheries sector is the most ready to face the deletion of the tariffs because its relatively unprotect and competitive in the world. As for forestry products, tariff deletion in the sectoral initiative is expected will not provide benefits due to raw material shortages (moratorium) which reduces the competitiveness of Indonesia in the world. While chemical products today have high protection and less competitive, the deletion of the tariff is predicted will lead to an increase in imports. However, if the goal is to achieve cheaper raw materials in the chemical industry, this product is recommended to be include in sectoral initiatives. 

References

Enderson, J.A. 1996. Effective Protection Redux. NBER Working Paper Series No. 5854

Antimiani, A., P Conforti, dan L. Salvatici. 2004. Effective Rate of Protection of European Agrifood Sector Dipresentasikan pada International Conference, Agricultural Policy Reform and WTO : Whre are we heading ?. Capri (Italy), 23-26 Juni ,2003.

Flatters, F. Tanpa Tahun. Measuring the Impacts of Trade Policies : Effective Rates of Protection.

Schydlowsky, D.M., dan M. Syrquin. 1972. The Esmations of CES Production Functions and Neutral Efficiency Levels Using Effective Rates of Protection as Price Deflators.The Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 54. No.1. PP. 78-83.

Humphrey, D.B. dan T. Tsukahara Jr (1970). On Substitution and the Effective Rate of Protection . International Economic Review, Vol.11 ,No 3.PP.488-496

Manasan, R.G. Tanpa Tahun. Effective Protetection Rates and Internal Indirect Texas In The Philippine Setting. Staff papar Series No. 83-04

Devarajan S. Dan C. Sussangkarn. 1992. Effective Rates of Protection When Domestic and Foreign Goods are Imperfect Substitutes : The Case of Thailand. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 74, No. 4, PP. 701-711

Siriwardana, M. 2000. Effects of Trade Liberalization in South Asia With Special Reference to Srilanka (paper). Dipresentasikan pada Third Annual Conference on Glonbal Economic Analysis, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 23-30 Juni

Gilbert. J.P. Tanpa Tahun. GTAP Model Analysis : Simulating the Effect of Korea- USA FTA Using Computable General Equilibrium Techniques Institute of Internasional Economics.

Francois, J.F., B.J Mcdonald dan H. Nordstrom (1996). Liberalization and Capital Accumulation in the GTAP Mode. GTAP Technical Paper No. 7.

Nicita A. 2004. Multilateral Trade Liberalization and Mexican Households : The Effect of the Doha Development Agenda dalam Putting Development Back into the Doha Agenda : Poverty Impacts of a WTO Agreement, Thomas W. Hertel and L Alan Winters (ed), World bank, Washington, D.C.

Published
2008-07-31
How to Cite
Lubis, A. D. (2008). ANALISIS KEIKUTSERTAAN INDONESIA DALAM INISIATIF SEKTORAL UNTUK PRODUK PERIKANAN, KIMIA DAN KEHUTANAN. Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan, 2(1), 93-124. https://doi.org/10.30908/bilp.v2i1.164
Section
Articles