Penjajakan Indonesia-Southern African Customs Union Preferential Trade Agreement Dalam Upaya Memperluas Peluang Pasar Non-Tradisional Dan Studi Simulasi Perdagangan Bebas Bilateral RI-Namibia

Main Article Content

Sulthon Sjahril Sabaruddin


This study examines the feasibility of the RI-SACU PTA cooperation in an effort to expand non-traditional market opportunities, especially in the Southern African region. The study illustrated that Southern African region, particularly SACU member countries, is one of the potential regions for alternative trade development, especially for the Indonesian exports. The methodologies used in this study are descriptive approach to describe the economic potentialities, the trade relations development and the level of complementarity of the RI-SACU trade structure, a review of the SACU economic cooperation with third parties, and quantitative approach using the partial equilibrium analysis method with the SMART Model to assess the impact of trade liberalization or free trade on trade, tariff revenue, and welfare effects. Furthermore, TCI results showed that Indonesian exports can better fulfill the import needs of the SACU member countries than vice versa (except South Africa). In an effort to boost the RI-SACU trade performance, the study suggests to establish RI-SACU PTA which is not only will open market access to the SACU region, but also it will make Indonesian products to become more competitive in the SACU market. Furthermore, this study also conducted a free trade simulation between Indonesia and Namibia (one of the member countries of SACU). The simulation uses the SMART Model partial equilibrium analysis method. The RI-Namibia (one of the SACU member states) free trade simulation depicts a very positive impact for Indonesia in which Indonesian exports to Namibia are estimated to increase quite significantly, and at the same time reducing performance of the Indonesian trade competitor countries, particularly South Africa and China, and in the ASEAN context, especially Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, and Vietnam. In addition, the simulation results also illustrate that trade liberalization between Indonesia and Namibia is predicted to reduce tariff revenues on both countries, and would increase the welfare of consumers from both countries. Furthermore, the challenges experienced and strategies adopted by India, China, and the United States in dealing with the SACU economic cooperation could become a valuable lesson learned for Indonesia pertaining to the RI-SACU PTA cooperation. This paper also suggests ASEAN-SACU PTA and RI-SACU TIDCA could become alternative options to the RI-SACU PTA. Also, it is equally important for the Indonesian government to continue making efforts to enhance Indonesian positive image in the SACU community on the quality and image of Indonesian products, and as well to consider the possibility of establishing production centers in SACU member countries.

Article Details



ASEAN Secretariat. (2022). Free Trade Agreements with Dialogue Partners. ASEAN Secretariat.
Bureau of Foreign Trade. (2021). Taiwan-Eswatini Economic Relations 2021. Ministry of Economic Affairs Taiwan.

Chaudhury, D. R. (2020). India revives initiative for Preferential Trade Agreement with S.African Customs Union. The Economic Times.

Department of Commerce. (2022). India-SACU Preferential Trade Agreement (PTA) Negotiations. Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India.

Department of International Trade and Economic Cooperation. (2022). China-SACU FTA. Ministry of Commerce People’s Republic of China.

Direktorat Perundingan Bilateral. (2020). Indonesia Bilateral Trade Negotiations: As of February 2020.

Elago, P. M. (2021). Entry Into Force of the Economic Partnership Agreement Between the SACU Member States, Mozambique and the United Kingdom Of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. SACU Secretariat.

Ellis, C. D. (2019). Developing Global Free Trade: China and the Southern African Customs Union. China Briefing.

Jenson, H. G., & Sandrey, R. (2006). A Possible SACU/China Free Trade Agreement (FTA): Implications for the South African Manufacturing Sector.

KBRI Windhoek. (2021). Dubes RI Windhoek Temui Executive Secretary Southern African Customs Union, Bahas Kerja Sama Ekonomi. KBRI Windhoek.

Kemlu. (2019). Penyampaian Prioritas Politik Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia 2019-2024.

Langton, D. (2008). United States-Southern African Customs Union (SACU) Free Trade Agreement Negotiations: Background and Potential Issues.

Lembaga Penyelidikan Ekonomi dan Masyarakat. (2020). Studi Peluang Pasar dan Dampak Ekonomi Perjanjian Perdagangan Indonesia – Mauritius.

Marthini, N. M. A. (2020). Manfaatkan Indonesia-Mozambique PTA: Dorong Perdagangan ke Benua Afrika.

Mikic, M., & Gilbert, J. (2009). Trade Statistics in Policymaking - A Handbook of Commonly Used Trade Indices and Indicators (Revised). United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.

Office of the United States Trade Representative. (2022). Southern African Customs Union (SACU). United States Trade Representative.

Ouattara, N., & Zeufack, A. G. (2022). Unlocking East Asian Markets to Sub-Saharan Africa. In S. Coulibaly, W. Kassa, & A. G. Zeufack (Eds.), Africa in the New Trade Environment Market Access in Troubled Times (pp. 135–185). World Bank Group.

Pusat Data dan Sistem Informasi. (2022). Neraca Perdagangan Dengan Mitra Dagang. Portal Statistik Perdagangan Kemendag RI.

Reddy, L. (2004). A China-SACU FTA: What’s in it for SA? South African Institute of International Affairs, August-September, 1–2.

SACU Secretariat. (2013a). About SACU: History of SACU. SACU Secretariat; SACU Secretariat.

SACU Secretariat. (2013b). Southern African Customs Union Agreement 2002 (As Amended on 12 April 2013).

SACU Secretariat. (2018). Southern African Customs Union. GoverMeta.

SACU Secretariat. (2022a). About SACU: History of SACU. SACU Secretariat.

SACU Secretariat. (2022b). About SACU: Vision and Mission.

SACU Secretariat. (2022c). Review of the Revenue Sharing Arrangement. SACU Secretariat. of the Revenue Sharing Arrangement

Sari, G. M. P. (2012). Implikasi Negosiasi Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) Uni Eropa terhadap Proses Integrasi Regional di Selatan Afrika (2002-2007). Universitas Indonesia.

Sjahril, S. (2021). Desain Klasterisasi Tujuan Pasar Ekspor Indonesia: Pasar Tradisional vs Pasar Non-Tradisional. Jurnal Hubungan Luar Negeri, 6(1), 1–29.

Sjahril, S. S. (2020). Memperkuat Hubungan Ekonomi dan Sosial Budaya Indonesia-Namibia Baru. Jurnal Kajian Lemhannas RI, 42(Juni), 49–59.

Sjahril, S., & Sunde, T. (2021). 30 Years of Indonesia-Namibia Diplomatic Relations: A Partial Equilibrium Free Trade Simulation Analysis. Journal of Namibian Studies, 30(2), 113–130.

Tsolo, M., Mogotsi, I. B., & Motlaleng, G. (2010). The Impact of European Union - South Africa Trade Development and Cooperation Agreement on Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia and Swaziland. Review of Economic and Business Studies, 3(1), 129–148.

United Nations Statistics Division. (2022). UN Comtrade Database. United Nations.

World Bank Group. (2022). World Bank Database. World Bank.

World Integrated Trade Solution. (2022). World Integrated Trade Solution Database. WITS World Bank.